Anti-HBV Surface Antigen Monoclonal antibody, Clone A090-18512

Background/Aims: Hepatitis B reactivation (HBVR) is an important risk of treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF). While antiviral prophylaxis is recommended before treatment in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients, there is no clear approach for the follow-up or prophylactic treatment of patients with past hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This study aimed to evaluate patients with past HBV infection treated with anti-TNF for HBVR and/or HBVR-associated biochemical breakthrough. Materials and Methods: Patients who received anti-TNF therapy and had past HBV infection (HBsAg negative, anti-HBc IgG positive, anti-HBs negative or positive) were screened and evaluated at 3-month intervals for viral and biochemical breakthrough according to a liver function test (ALT) and HBV DNA level. Results: A total of 653 patients who received anti-TNF therapy were screened. Ninety of these patients had past HBV infection and had not received antiviral prophylaxis. Anti-HBs positivity and isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity were seen in 87.7% (n: 79) and 12.2% (n: 11) of these patients, respectively. No HBVR was seen in 20% (n: 18) of patients who were followed up regularly, and no HBVR-associated biochemical breakthrough was found in patients who were not followed up regularly in terms of HBV DNA level (80%, n: 72) during the follow-up period (26 +/- 16 months). Conclusion: The use of anti-TNF in patients with past HBV infection has a low risk for HBVR. A follow-up for the ALT and HBV DNA levels at 3-month intervals may be more reasonable than administering antiviral prophylaxis to all patients.

Background Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel mono-pegylated interferon that has only one major form as opposed to 8-14 isomers of other on-market pegylated interferon, allowing injection every two or more weeks with higher tolerability. It received European Medicines Agency and Taiwan marketing authorization in 2019 and 2020, for treatment of polycythemia vera. This phase I/II study aimed to have preliminary evaluation of safety and efficacy in chronic hepatitis B. Methods Thirty-one HBeAg-positive and 31 HBeAg-negative were stratified by HBeAg status and randomized at 1:1:1 ratio to q2w ropeginterferon alfa-2b 350 mu g (group 1), q2w 450 mu g (group 2) or q1w PEG-IFN alfa-2a 180 mu g (group 3). Each patient received 48-week treatment (TW48) and 24-week post-treatment follow-up (FW24). Results The baseline demographics were comparable among the three groups, except for mean HBeAg in HBeAg-positive patients (2.90, 2.23, 2.99 log(10) S/CO, respectively). Cumulative HBeAg seroconversion rate at follow-up period was 27.3% (3/11), 36.4% (4/11), and 11.1% (1/9) with time to HBeAg seroconversion starting from TW24, TW16, and TW48 in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The rate of HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL and HBsAg levels < 1500 IU/mL at FW24 were comparable in all groups. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (group 1 & 2) had numerically lower incidence of rash (9.5% and 4.5%) as compared to PEG-IFN alfa-2a (36.8%). Ropeginterferon alfa-2b 350 mu g (group 1) had more ALT elevation (38.1%), however the rate was comparable in group 2 (9.1%) and group 3 (10.5%). Conclusion In this preliminary study, ropeginterferon alfa-2b, although in only half the number of injections, is as safe and effective as pegylated interferon alfa-2a for chronic hepatitis B. [GRAPHICS] .