Tuberculosis and COVID-19: An overlapping situation during pandemic
JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Authors: Sarinoglu, Rabia Can; Sili, Uluhan; Eryuksel, Emel; Yildizeli, Sehnaz Olgun; Cimsit, Cagatay; Yagci, Aysegul Karahasan
Abstract
Introduction: The novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). First COVID-19 case was detected in March, 10, 2020 in Turkey and as of May, 18, 2020 148,067 cases have been identified and 4096 citizens have died. Tuberculosis (TB) is a worldwide public health concern, incidence of tuberculosis (per 100,000 people) in Turkey was reported at 14, 1 in 2018. During pandemic COVID-19 was the main concern in every clinic and as we discuss here overlapping respiratory diseases may result in delaying of the diagnosis and treatment. Methodology: There were 4605 respiratory samples examined between March 23 and May 18 for COVID-19 and 185 samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in our laboratory. The Xpert Ultra assay was performed for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis; SARS-CoV-2 RNA was determined by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis in combined nasopharyngeal and deep oropharyngeal swabs of suspected cases of COVID-19. Results: Both of SARS-CoV-2 and M. tuberculosis tests were requested on the clinical and radiological grounds in 30 patients. Here we discussed 2 patients who were both COVID-19 and TB positive. One patient already diagnosed with tuberculosis become COVID-19 positive during hospitalization and another patient suspected and treated for COVID-19 received the final diagnosis of pulmonary TB and Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection. Conclusions: We want to emphasize that while considering COVID-19 primarily during these pandemic days, we should not forget one of the "great imitators", tuberculosis within differential diagnoses.
Prevalence and molecular characterization of amikacin resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from southern China
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE
Authors: Islam, Md Mahmudul; Tan, Yaoju; Hameed, H. M. Adnan; Liu, Yang; Chhotaray, Chiranjibi; Cai, Xiaoyin; Liu, Zhiyong; Lu, Zhili; Wang, Shuai; Cai, Xingshan; Su, Biyi; Li, Xinjie; Tan, Shouyong; Liu, Jianxiong; Zhang, Tianyu
Abstract
Objectives: Amikacin is the only second-line injectable antituberculosis (anti-TB) drug still recommended for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment when a short MDR-TB regimen is designed. Mutations in rrs and eis are reported to be associated with resistance to amikacin. In this study, we investigated the incidence of rrs, eis, tap and whiB7 mutations in amikacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates to find the proportion of different mutations related to amikacin resistance. Methods: A total of 395 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were used for phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) to 10 drugs with the Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) method. We sequenced rrs, eis, tap and whiB7 genes in 178 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates (89 amikacin-resistant isolates and 89 of 306 amikacin-susceptible isolates). Results: Our data showed that 22.53% (89/395) M. tuberculosis clinical isolates were resistant to amikacin. Of the 89 amikacin-resistant isolates, 89.89% (80/89) were MDR-TB, of which 12.36% (11/89) were preextensively drug-resistant TB (pre-XDR-TB) and 77.53% (69/89) were XDR-TB. The rrs mutations were found in 82% (73/89) in amikacin-resistant M. tuberculosis clinical isolates. The A1401G alteration in the rrs gene was the most dominant mutation (80.90%; 72/89). Five mutations were detected as new in rrs, tap and whiB7. Notably, 13.48% (12/89) amikacin-resistant isolates had no known mutation in these genes. Conclusions: Our data reveal that the rrs mutation is a predominant molecular marker of amikacin resistance in southern China. Analysis of the rrs gene mutations will significantly reduce the time and cost to diagnose amikacin resistance in TB patients. Other unknown amikacin resistance mechanism(s) exist. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.