Anti-RSV monoclonal antibody, clone 2312

After the implementation of the Xpert Xpress Flu/respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) assay for rapid respiratory molecular testing, we investigated the significance of reported endpoint values for influenza A, influenza B, and RSV. This study prospectively analyzed nasopharyngeal swabs submitted to our virology laboratory in the 2018/19 influenza season. Initial testing was performed on the Xpress Flu/RSV assay. Samples were further tested on a laboratory-developed multiplex polymerase chain reaction (laboratory-developed multiplex respiratory test [LDT]) if the sample was reported as negative by the Xpress Flu/RSV but had an elevated endpoint value >= 5 for any respiratory virus target. There were 1040 negative results on the Xpress Flu/RSV; thirty-one had at least one endpoint value >= 5 [influenza A (25), influenza B (1), RSV (2), influenza A/RSV (1), and influenza A/B/RSV (2)]. Five samples (5/31, 16.1%) were positive on the LDT for influenza A or RSV. In contrast, the positivity rate on the LDT for negative Xpress Flu/RSV samples with endpoint values less than 5 was 0.35% (P < .0001). A threshold for endpoint values could not reliably be established to differentiate a potential influenza A positive result from a negative result on the LDT. Routine evaluation ofendpoint values should be a consideration for laboratories implementing Xpress Flu/RSV, in addition to supplementary respiratory virus testing for clinically relevant situations.

Objective: To assess the prevalence of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in adults hospitalized for a respiratory infection in the winter months and to evaluate the impact of a viral diagnosis on empirical antimicrobial management (antibiotics and antivirals). Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Acute-care university hospital. Patients: The study included 963 adult patients hospitalized over a 4-year surveillance period. Methods: Annual surveillance timelines were defined according to epidemiological criteria related to the circulation of RSV and influenza viruses in the general population. Patients were screened following a severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) case definition at the emergency department and were enrolled for molecular assay targeting influenza/RSV viruses after oral informed consent. Epidemiological and clinical data were recorded prospectively, microbiological investigations, antimicrobial management, and outcome data were reviewed retrospectively. Results: An influenza or RSV virus was documented in 316 of 963 patients (33%). Optimization of antimicrobial management (AM) was achieved in 162 of 265 patients (61%) with a positive viral diagnosis and no bacterial infection at admission (AM treatment not initiated, n = 111; discontinued, n = 51). In contrast, only 128 of 462 patients (28%) with negative microbiological investigations did not have AM treatment initiated (n = 116) or had such treatment discontinued (n = 12). Early, targeted antiviral treatment was prescribed in 235 of 253 patients (93%) confirmed with influenza. Epidemiological, clinical, and outcome data were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Epidemiological surveillance associated with influenza/RSV molecular diagnosis in adults hospitalized for severe winter respiratory infections dramatically enhanced antimicrobial management.