Preoperative Risk Classification Using Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Albumin for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephroureterectomy
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
Authors: Zhao, Zihan; Xie, Shangxun; Feng, Baofu; Zhang, Shiwei; Sun, Yifan; Guo, Hongqian; Yang, Rong
Abstract
Purpose: To improve the preoperative prediction of the outcomes of patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), we explored various preoperative laboratory factors and established a prognostic risk stratification method. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 232 UTUC patients who underwent RNU from September 2010 to October 2019 and analyzed their comprehensive clinicopathologic data and preoperative blood-based biomarkers. Kaplan-Meier analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the relationship between these factors and the prognosis. Results: The median follow-up and age were 24 months and 68.5 years, respectively. Preoperative elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR 3.44) and decreased albumin (ALB < 39.8 g/L) were negatively correlated with progression-free survival (PFS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients were sorted into three groups based on their NLR and ALB: the low-risk group (neither elevated NLR nor decreased ALB), intermediate-risk group (either elevated NLR or decreased ALB) and high-risk group (elevated NLR and decreased ALB). Their 5-year PFS rates were 77.8%, 52.6% and 32.3%; their 5-year CSS rates were 97.7%, 71.4% and 32.9%; and their 5-year OS rates were 92.7%, 70.4% and 29.2%, respectively (all P < 0.0001). ROC curves analysis showed that NLR plus ALB had a more accurate prognostic value (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative risk classification using NLR and ALB was identified as an independent prognostic factor for patients with UTUC. The combination of NLR and ALB may help to determine the most appropriate treatment options before RNU.
Prediction of median survival time in sepsis patients by the SOFA score combined with different predictors
BURNS & TRAUMA
Authors: Li, Wen; Wang, Meiping; Zhu, Bo; Zhu, Yibing; Xi, Xiuming
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The purpose of this study was to explore the prognostic value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and procalcitonin (PCT), albumin (ALB), and lactate (LAC) levels in patients with sepsis. Methods: Consecutive adult patients with suspected or documented sepsis at ICU admission were recruited. Their basic vital signs and related auxiliary examinations to determine their PCT and ALB levels and APACHE II score were recorded at ICU admission, and their LAC levels and SOFA scores were recorded for one week after admission. The influence of these variables on hospital mortality was evaluated. Logistic regression was used to derive the Sepsis Hospital Mortality Score (SHMS), a prediction equation describing the relationship between predictors and hospital mortality. The median survival time was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. In the validation group, the kappa value was calculated to evaluate the stability of the derived formula. Results: This study included 894 sepsis patients admitted to 18 ICUs in 16 tertiary hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group (626 cases) and validation group (258 cases). In addition, a nonsurvival group (248 patients) of the experimental group was established according to the outcome at the time of discharge. The hospital mortality rate in the experimental group was 39.6% (248/626). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses revealed that the APACHE II score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.178), Delta SOFA (OR = 1.186), Delta LAC (OR = 1.157), and SOFA mean score (OR = 1.086) were independently associated with hospital mortality. The SHMS was calculated as logit(p) = 4.715 - (0.164 x APACHE II) - (0.171 x Delta SOFA) - (0.145 x Delta LAC) - (0.082 x SOFA mean). A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to further investigate the accuracy of the SHMS, with an area under the curve of 0.851 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.821-0.882; p < 0.001) for hospital mortality. In the low-risk group and high-risk groups, the corresponding median survival times were 15 days and 11 days, respectively. Conclusion: The APACHE II score, Delta SOFA, ALAC and SOFA mean score were independently associated with hospital mortality in sepsis patients and accurately predicted the hospital mortality rate and median survival time. Data on the median survival time in sepsis patients could be provided to clinicians to assist in the rational use of limited medical resources by facilitating prudent resource allocation.