Rabbit Anti-Human AKT1 (phospho Thr308) monoclonal antibody, clone C29I23M32

Adenomyoepitheliomas (AMEs) of the breast are uncommon and span the morphologic spectrum of benign, atypical, in situ, and invasive forms. In exceptionally rare cases, these tumors metastasize to regional lymph nodes or distant sites. In the era of genomic characterization, data is limited regarding AMEs. The aim of this study was to provide insight into the molecular underpinnings of a spectrum of AMEs. Seven cases of AMEs of the breast (benign-1, atypical-2, in situ-1, invasive-3) were identified in our files. The seven samples were interrogated using the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 (ThermoFisher). Two atypical AMEs and the malignant in situ AME harbored the same gain-of-function PIK3CA mutation. The malignant in situ AME also showed EGFR amplification, not described previously. Both a benign AME and a malignant invasive AME shared the same gain-of-function AKT1 variant. The benign AME also showed a GNAS mutation. Moreover, the same gain-of-function HRAS mutation was present in an atypical AME and a malignant invasive AME. We also identified co-occurring HRAS and PIK3CA mutations in an ER-positive atypical AME, which has not been previously described. No fusion drivers were detected. We describe the molecular characteristics of the spectrum of AME tumors of the breast, which harbor alterations in the PI3K/AKT pathway. Our findings are clinically relevant with respect to the current options of targeted therapy in the rare instances where malignant AME tumors of the breast progress.

Background: Proline levels are significantly increased in tumor specimens and urine samples from gastric cancer (GC) patients, and we previously showed that intracellular proline levels significantly differ between human GC cell lines and normal gastric epithelial cells. Pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 1 (PYCR1) is the key enzyme in intracellular proline synthesis, but its role in GC remains largely unknown. Methods: Bioinformatic analysis and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with a tissue microarray were conducted to assess the association between PYCR1 expression and clinical parameters. PYCR1 downregulation and overexpression were then established in two GC cell lines (AGS and MICN28 cells) to determine whether PYCR1 promotes malignant behavior in GC. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was further performed to investigate the pathway regulating PYCR1 in GC. Results: PYCR1 expression was up-regulated in different GC cohorts. High PYCR1 protein expression was correlated with advanced tumor stage, aggressive histological type and high Ki-67 index. High PYCR1 expression in GC tissues was an indicator of poor outcome in GC patients. In vitro, PYCR1 knockdown markedly attenuated GC cells growth and promoted apoptosis, while overexpression produced the opposite effects. GSEA analysis indicated PI3K/Akt axis was strongly correlated with PYCR1 expression and that PIK3CB and AKT1 mRNA expression was positively associated with PYCR1 in GC tissues. PI3K inhibition further significantly reduced PYCR1 mRNA and protein expression. Moreover, as PYCR1 is a mitochondrial endomembrane protein, nutrient stress induced by glucose deprivation also regulated PYCR1 expression. Conclusions: PYCR1 is highly expressed in GC and acts as a mitochondrial oncogene to induce cancer progression by enhancing tumor proliferation and responding to metabolic stress. PYCR1 is a novel prognostic marker and a potential therapeutic target in GC.