Anti-TAT monoclonal antibody, clone O4

Background The optimal antithrombotic regimen in patients with a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation (OAT) presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. Objectives To perform a network meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating different antithrombotic regimens among patients with ACS or undergoing PCI requiring OAT. Methods Network meta-analysis was performed in a frequentist framework. Antithrombotic regimens were categorized by OAC type (vitamin K antagonist-based [VKA]; non-VKA OAT [NOAC]) and antiplatelet agents (P2Y inhibitor only: dual therapy [DAT]; P2Y plus aspirin: triple therapy [TAT]). Safety outcomes were Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Efficacy outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and stent-thrombosis (ST). Results Five RCTs were included, encompassing 10,797 patients (atrial fibrillation 69-100%, ACS 28-62%, PCI 77-100%). Both VKA and NOAC-based DAT regimens reduced the occurrence of TIMI major bleeding compared to VKA TAT (VKA DAT: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.98; NOAC DAT: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.70). Nevertheless, only NOAC DAT significantly reduced the occurrence of ICH compared to VKA TAT (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17-0.64). Ischemic outcomes were similar among the four treatment regimens. However, numerical, potentially clinically important, higher ST occurrence was observed for NOAC DAT as compared to both VKA TAT (1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.33) and NOAC TAT (1.86, 95% CI 0.93-3.73). Conclusion DAT regimens present the highest safety profile among antithrombotic strategies, with a NOAC-specific impact on ICH reduction. NOAC DAT might entail clinically important higher ST occurrence, warranting a case-by-case comprehensive evaluation that integrates patient- and procedure-related residual ischemic risk with the patient-specific bleeding risk.

Aortic aneurysms and vascular malformations are sometimes associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). A typical blood coagulation test shows decrease in platelet count and fibrinogen, and increases in fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) and D-dimer. The coagulation activation marker thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) and the fibrinolysis activation marker plasmin-alpha(2) plasmin inhibitor (PIC) are significantly increased. alpha(2) plasmin inhibitor (alpha 2PI) is significantly reduced. Since no prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) is noticeable and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is shortened in some cases, DIC cannot be diagnosed or ruled out by PT and APTT alone. The cornerstone of treatment for DIC is to treat the underlying disease. However, surgery is not possible in some cases. Follow-up may be appropriate in patients with abnormal results from coagulation tests and no bleeding. However, pharmacotherapy is often required in cases with bleeding. Unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, protease inhibitors, recombinant thrombomodulin, direct oral anticoagulants, and factor XIII preparations are effective. If PIC is significantly increased and alpha 2PI is significantly decreased, or if the bleeding is severe, tranexamic acid is used as an antifibrinolytic therapy with anticoagulant therapy. In such cases, attention should be paid not only to TAT but also changes in PIC.