Rabbit Anti-Human FGFR4 monoclonal antibody, clone 25I20M0

Drug-resistance acquisition through kinase gate-keeper mutations is a major hurdle in the clinic. Here, we determined the first crystal structures of the human FGFR4 kinase domain (FGFR4K) alone and complexed with ponatinib, a promiscuous type-2 (DFG-out) kinase inhibitor, and an oncogenic FGFR4K harboring the V550L gate-keeper mutation bound to FIIN-2, a new type-1 irreversible inhibitor. Remarkably, like ponatinib, FIIN-2 also binds in the DFG-out mode despite lacking a functional group necessary to occupy the pocket vacated upon the DFG-out flip. Structural analysis reveals that the covalent bond between FIIN-2 and a cysteine, uniquely present in the glycine-rich loop of FGFR kinases, facilitates the DFG-out conformation, which together with the internal flexibility of FIIN-2 enables FIIN-2 to avoid the steric clash with the gate-keeper mutation that causes the ponatinib resistance. The structural data provide a blueprint for the development of next generation anticancer inhibitors through combining the salient inhibitory mechanisms of ponatinib and FIIN-2.

Background: The prevalence and types of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) mutations vary significantly among different ethnic groups. The optimal application of FGFR inhibitors depends on these variations being comprehensively understood. However, such an analysis has yet to be conducted in Chinese patients. Methods: We retrospectively screened the genomic profiling results of 10,582 Chinese cancer patients across 16 cancer types to investigate the frequency and distribution of FGFR aberrations. Results: 14;FR aberrations were identified in 745 patients, equating to an overall prevalence of 7.0%. A majority of the aberrations occurred on FGFR1 (56.8%), which was followed by FGFR3 (17.7%), FGFR2 (14.4%), and FGFR4 (2.8%). Further, 8.5% of patients had aberrations of more than 1 FGFR gene. The most common types of aberrations were amplification (53.7%), other mutations (38.8%), and fusions (5.6%). FGFR fusion and amplification occurred concurrently in 1.9% of the patients. FGFR aberrations were detected in 12 of the 16 cancers, with the highest prevalence belonging to colorectal cancer (CRC) (31%). Other FGFR-aberrant cancer types included stomach (16.8%), breast (14.3%), and esophageal (12.7%) cancer. Breast tumors were also more likely than other cancer types to have concurrent FGFR rearrangements and amplifications (P<0.001). In comparison with the public dataset, our cohort had a significantly higher number of FGFR aberrations in colorectal (P<0.001) and breast cancer (P=0.05). Conclusions: Among the Chinese cancer patients in our study, the overall prevalence of FGFR aberrations was 7.0%. FGFR1 amplification was the most common genetic alteration in CRC, breast cancer, and lung cancer; while FGFR2 amplification was more commonly observed in gastric cancer than in other cancers in our cohort. Our study advances the understanding of the distribution of FGFR aberrations in various cancer types in the Chinese population, which will facilitate the further development of FGFR inhibitors.