Multi-laboratory validation of DNAxs including the statistical library DNAStatistX
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS
Authors: Benschop, Corina C. G.; Hoogenboom, Jerry; Bargeman, Fiep; Hovers, Pauline; Slagter, Martin; van der Linden, Jennifer; Parag, Raymond; Kruise, Dennis; Drobnic, Katja; Klucevsek, Gregor; Parson, Walther; Berger, Burkhard; Laurent, Francois Xavier; Faivre, Magalie; Ulus, Ayhan; Schneider, Peter; Bogus, Magdalena; Kneppers, Alexander L. J.; Sijen, Titia
Abstract
This study describes a multi-laboratory validation of DNAxs, a DNA eXpert System for the data management and probabilistic interpretation of DNA profiles D. and its statistical library DNAStatistX to which, besides the organising laboratory, four laboratories participated. The software was modified to read multiple data formats and the study was performed prior to the release of the software to the forensic community. The first exercise explored all main functionalities of DNAxs with feedback on user-friendliness, installation and general performance. Next, every laboratory performed likelihood ratio (LR) calculations using their own dataset and a dataset provided by the organising laboratory. The organising laboratory performed LR calculations using all datasets. The datasets were generated with different STR typing kits or analysis systems and consisted of samples varying in DNA amounts, mixture ratios, number of contributors and drop-out level. Hypothesis sets had the correct, under- and over-assigned number of contributors and true and false donors as person of interest. When comparing the results between laboratories, the LRs were foremost within one unit on log10 scale. The few LR results that deviated more had differences for the parameters estimated by the optimizer within DNAStatistX. Some of these were indicated by failed iteration results, others by a failed model validation, since unrealistic hypotheses were included. When these results that do not meet the quality criteria were excluded, as is in accordance with interpretation guidelines, none of the analyses in the different laboratories yielded a different statement in the casework report. Nonetheless, changes in software parameters were sought that minimized differences in outcomes, which made the DNAStatistX module more robust. Overall, the software was found intuitive, user-friendly and valid for use in multiple laboratories.
Massively parallel sequencing of sex-chromosomal STRs in Saudi Arabia reveals patrilineage-associated sequence variants
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS
Authors: Khubrani, Yahya M.; Jobling, Mark A.; Wetton, Jon H.
Abstract
Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) of forensic STRs has the potential to reveal additional allele diversity compared to conventional capillary electrophoresis (CE) typing strategies, but population studies are currently relatively few in number. The Verogen ForenSeg (TM) DNA Signature Prep Kit includes both Y-STRs and X-STRs among its targeted loci, and here we report the sequences of these loci, analysed using Verogen's ForenSeg (TM) Universal Analysis Software (UAS) v1.3 and STRait Razor v3.0, in a representative sample of 89 Saudi Arabian males. We identified 56 length variants (equivalent to CE alleles) and 75 repeat sequence sub-variants across the six X-STRs analysed; equivalent figures for the set of 24 Y-STRs were 147 and 192 respectively. We also observed two flanking sequence variants for the X-, and six for the Y-STRs. Recovery of sequence data and concordance with CE data (where available) across the tested loci was good, though rare flanking variation affected interpretation and allele calling at DYF38751 and DX57132. Examination of flanking sequences of the Y-STRs revealed five SNPs (L255, M4790, BY7692, Z16708 and S17543) previously shown to define specific haplogmups by Y-chromosome sequencing. These define Y-haplogroups in 62 % of our sample, a proportion that increases to 91 % when haplogroup-associated repeat-sequence motifs are also considered. A population-level comparison of the Saudi Arabian X-STRs with a global sample showed our dataset to be part of a large cluster of populations of West Eurasian and Middle Eastern origin.