Characterization of pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma reveals genomic heterogeneity and diverse signaling pathway activation
PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
Authors: Haines, Katherine; Sarabia, Stephen F.; Alvarez, Karla R.; Tomlinson, Gail; Vasudevan, Sanjeev A.; Heczey, Andras A.; Roy, Angshumoy; Finegold, Milton J.; Parsons, D. Williams; Plon, Sharon E.; Lopez-Terrada, Dolores
Abstract
Background Pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a rare liver tumor in children with a poor prognosis. Comprehensive molecular profiling to understand the underlying genomic drivers of this tumor has not been completed, and it is unclear whether nonfibrolamellar pediatric HCC is more genomically similar to hepatoblastoma or adult HCC. Procedure To characterize the molecular landscape of these tumors, we analyzed a cohort of 15 pediatric non-FL-HCCs by sequencing a panel of cancer-associated genes and conducting copy-number and gene-expression analyses. Results We detected multiple types of molecular alterations in Wnt signaling genes, including APC inversion, AMER1 somatic mutation, and most commonly CTNNB1 intragenic deletions. There were multiple alterations to the telomerase pathway via TERT activation or ATRX mutation. Therapeutically targetable activating mutations in MAPK/ERK signaling pathway genes, including MAPK1 and BRAF, were detected in 20% of tumors. TP53 mutations occurred far less frequently in our pediatric HCC cohort than reported in adult cohorts. Tumors arising in children with underlying liver disease were found to be molecularly distinct from the remainder and lacking detectable oncogenic drivers, as compared with those arising in patients without a history of underlying liver disease; the majority of both types were positive for glypican-3, another potential therapeutic target. Conclusion Our study revealed pediatric HCC to be a molecularly heterogeneous group of tumors. Those non-FL-HCC tumors arising in the absence of underlying liver disease harbor genetic alterations affecting multiple cancer pathways, most notably Wnt signaling, and share some characteristics with adult HCC.
Clinicopathologic features and genomic analysis of pulmonary blastomatoid carcinosarcoma
BMC CANCER
Authors: Zhao, Jikai; Xiang, Chan; Zhao, Ruiying; Guo, Ping; Zheng, Jingjing; Han, Han-Zhang; Yu, Keke; Zhang, Jie; Han, Yuchen
Abstract
Background This study was designed to investigate the clinicopathologic features of pulmonary blastomatoid carcinosarcoma and explore the genomic profiles of epithelial and mesenchymal components in this tumor. Methods Three cases of pulmonary blastomatoid carcinosarcoma were enrolled in this study. Clinicopathologic information and prognostic data were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry was performed. The epithelial and mesenchymal components were microdissected to investigate the genomic profiles by performing capture-based targeted next generation sequencing. Results The epithelial components in patient one consisted of low-grade and high-grade fetal lung adenocarcinoma. Low-grade epithelial cells showed nuclear expression of beta-catenin and missense mutation of CTNNB1. The epithelial components in another two patients consisted of high-grade fetal lung adenocarcinoma/enteric adenocarcinoma. The epithelial cells showed membrane staining of beta-catenin and harbored no mutation of CTNNB1. The mesenchymal components in all three tumors were composed of primitive round/spindle cells without definite differentiation and showed cytoplasmic dot positive of beta-catenin and no corresponding mutation. Within a tumor, both components exhibited relatively comparable molecular profile. In patient one, 4 mutations: RB1, FAT3, PTCH1 and LRP1B were shared by both epithelial and mesenchymal components. Epithelial component had additional mutations in BCOR, CTNNB1, CTCF, FAT1 and DICER1. In patient two, 12 mutations were shared. The epithelial component had BRCA2 mutation and the mesenchymal had mutations in CREBBP, ALK, DNMT3A, ASXL2, MYCN and RICTOR. Patient three had 6 shared mutations. The epithelial component had an additional mutation in KAT6A and the mesenchymal had an additional mutation in APC. Collectively, we observed heterogeneity between epithelial and mesenchymal components of the same tumor. Conclusions Blastomatoid carcinosarcoma showed characteristic morphology and immunophenotype. Parallel detection of genetic abnormalities in epithelial and mesenchymal components could provide further evidence for tumor differentiation, molecular targeting and differential diagnosis.