Desmoid with biweekly methotrexate and vinblastine shows similar effects to weekly administration: A phase II clinical trial
CANCER SCIENCE
Authors: Nishida, Yoshihiro; Hamada, Shunsuke; Urakawa, Hiroshi; Ikuta, Kunihiro; Sakai, Tomohisa; Koike, Hiroshi; Ito, Kan; Emoto, Ryo; Ando, Yuichi; Matsui, Shigeyuki
Abstract
Low-dose methotrexate (MTX) plus vinblastine (VBL) chemotherapy is an effective treatment for desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF). However, previous reports have described a weekly regimen, with no reports available on a biweekly one. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of a biweekly regimen in a cohort prospectively treated in our single institution. Since 2010, we have prospectively treated refractory DF patients with biweekly MTX (30 mg/m(2)) + VBL (6 mg/m(2)). Efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and correlating factors were analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. In total, 38 patients received low-dose MTX + VBL therapy, and its efficacy was assessed in 37 of them. Nineteen (51%) patients showed partial response (PR). Clinical benefit rate was 95%. PFS at 5 y was 80.8%. In PR cases, median time to response was 10 mo. Longer duration of therapy was significantly associated with the response of PR (P = .007) by univariate analysis. There was no clear association between various clinicopathological factors, including tumor size, location, catenin beta-1 (CTNNB1) mutation status with effect. Only 3 AEs of grade 3/4 were observed. Tumor regrowth after MTX + VBL discontinuation was observed in 5 (20%) of 25 patients. Biweekly administration of MTX + VBL chemotherapy was well tolerated compared with weekly administration, and its efficacy was anticipated in DF patents, although the time needed to achieve a response may be relatively long. The treatment interval should be determined taking into account both the condition of the tumor and the patient's preference.
Intracholecystic Papillary Neoplasms Are Distinct From Papillary Gallbladder Cancers A Clinicopathologic and Exome-sequencing Study
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Authors: Akita, Masayuki; Fujikura, Kohei; Ajiki, Tetsuo; Fukumoto, Takumi; Otani, Kyoko; Hirose, Takanori; Tominaga, Masahiro; Itoh, Tomoo; Zen, Yoh
Abstract
Although intracholecystic papillary neoplasms (ICPNs) have been increasingly recognized, their features remain unclear because of the lack of standardized definition. This study aimed to elucidate clinicopathologic and genetic features of ICPNs using stringent diagnostic criteria. On the basis of the recently proposed criteria, gallbladder neoplasms showing delicate papillary growth were diagnosed as ICPNs, while polypoid papillary adenocarcinomas arranged in a complex architecture were categorized as papillary gallbladder cancers (GBCs). Clinicopathologic features were compared among ICPNs (n= 7), papillary GBCs (n= 24), and nonpapillary GBCs (n= 44). Whole-exome and validation Sanger sequencing was also conducted. Gross mucin hypersecretion was detected in 3/7 ICPNs (43%), 1/24 papillary GBCs (4%), and 1/44 nonpapillary GBCs (2%) (P< 0.001). All patients with ICPN lacked lymphovascular invasion and nodal metastasis, while these features were occasionally observed in patients with papillary or nonpapillary GBC (13% to 59%). ICPNs were less advanced than papillary and nonpapillary GBCs (P< 0.001) with all cases of ICPNs being recurrence-free. Whole-exome and Sanger sequencing identified somatic mutations in STK11 (a causative gene of Peutz-Jegher syndrome; n= 3), CTNNB1 (n= 2), and APC (a gene of familial adenomatous polyposis; n= 1) in ICPNs, while those alterations were exceptional in papillary and nonpapillary GBCs. ICPNs more commonly showed cytoplasmic and/or nuclear expressions of ss-catenin than papillary and nonpapillary GBCs. In conclusion, the histologybased classification of gallbladder papillary neoplasms is useful for identifying ICPNs that share clinicopathologic features with the pancreatic counterpart. ICPNs meeting the criteria were genetically distinct from papillary and nonpapillary GBCs, with STK11, CTNNB1, and APC being identified as major driver genes for ICPNs.