Ossifying Pilomatrixoma of the Eyelid
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Authors: Charles, Norman C.; Kim, Eleanore T.
Abstract
Pilomatrixoma, an uncommon, usually benign cutaneous appendageal tumor, shows differentiation toward the hair follicle matrix cell. It undergoes various histopathologic stages, early on displaying epithelial and shadow cells along with granulomatous inflammation. In later stages, illustrated by this unusual case, epithelial cells disappear and are replaced by calcification and ossification. Immunohistochemistry in the current case showed transitional cell reactivity for beta-catenin, probably linking the tumor to a mutation in the beta-catenin gene CTNNB1. There was also transitional cell positivity for cyclin D1, a marker found in matrical cells of the human hair follicle. While pilomatrixoma occurs occasionally in the eyelid, the ossified eyelid variant in the current case is very rare, with only one preceding description in the literature.
The molecular mechanisms underlying reduced E-cadherin expression in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: high throughput analysis of large cohorts
MODERN PATHOLOGY
Authors: Alsaleem, Mansour; Toss, Michael S.; Joseph, Chitra; Aleskandarany, Mohammed; Kurozumi, Sasagu; Alshankyty, Ibrahim; Ogden, Angela; Rida, Padmashree C. G.; Ellis, Ian O.; Aneja, Ritu; Green, Andrew R.; Mongan, Nigel P.; Rakha, Emad A.
Abstract
E-cadherin is a tumor suppressor gene in invasive lobular breast cancer. However, a proportion of high-grade ductal carcinoma shows reduced/loss of E-cadherin. In this study, we assessed the underlying mechanisms and molecular implications of E-cadherin loss in invasive ductal carcinoma. This study used large, well-characterized cohorts of early-stage breast cancer-evaluated E-cadherin expression via various platforms including immunohistochemistry, microarray analysis using Illumina HT-12 v3, copy number analysis using Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays, and next-generation sequencing for differential gene expression. Our results showed 27% of high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma showed reduced/loss of E-cadherin membranous expression. CDH1 copy number loss was in 21% of invasive ductal carcinoma, which also showed low CDH1 mRNA expression (p = 0.003). CDH1 copy number was associated with copy number loss of TP53, ATM, BRCA1, and BRCA2 (p < 0.001). Seventy-nine percent of invasive ductal carcinoma with reduced CDH1 mRNA expression showed elevated expression of E-cadherin transcription suppressors TWIST2, ZEB2, NFKB1, LLGL2, CTNNB1 (p < 0.01). Reduced/loss E-cadherin expression was associated with differential expression of 2143 genes including those regulating Wnt (FZD2, GNG5, HLTF, WNT2, and CER1) and PIK3-AKT (FGFR2, GNF5, GNGT1, IFNA17, and IGF1) signaling pathways. Interestingly, key genes differentially expressed between invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal tumors did not show association with E-cadherin loss in invasive ductal carcinoma. We conclude that E-cadherin loss in invasive ductal carcinoma is likely a consequence of genomic instability occurring during carcinogenesis. Potential novel regulators controlling E-cadherin expression in invasive ductal carcinoma warrant further investigation.