Human Sperm Protein 17 ELISA kit

Background Worldwide, there has been a growing interest in oncofertility issues. In 2017, the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology published clinical practice guidelines for fertility preservation (FP) in cancer patients. We conducted a questionnaire survey to explore the FP practices among hematologists before the publication of this guideline. Methods We sent 427 designated cancer hospitals in Japan a questionnaire about FP treatment for patients with hematological malignancies between January and December 2014. Results Of these, 137 institutions responded, and 81 (19.0%) were included in the analysis. A total of 324 female and 441 male patients, aged < 40 years, were treated. The percentage of patients informed about FP was higher in patients treated with hematopoietic cell transplant than those without. Female patients were less likely to be informed about FP than male patients. FP was performed in a total of 27 female patients: 20 oocyte cryopreservation, 2 embryo cryopreservation, 3 ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and 2 ovarian shielding during total body irradiation. Sperm cryopreservation was performed in 115 male patients. Conclusions Our findings indicate the reality of fertility preservation in 2014, before the guideline were issued. Further studies are warranted to investigate the improvement in fertility preservation since the guidelines were issued.

Germline genome editing has garnered dire predictions about its societal effects, but experience with other reproductive technologies should caution us about making extravagant claims. Amniocentesis was predicted to result in increased stigmatization of people born with Down syndrome, but in fact people with these conditions have been increasingly integrated into schools and workplaces. Artificial insemination by donor was predicted to result in women choosing to "optimize" their children, but in fact most women eschewed the offerings of the so-called "genius sperm bank," and when choosing among donors, have tended to look for those who most resemble their husbands and partners. IVF was predicted to cause parents to view children as commodities, but no such change has been evidenced. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis was predicted to become widespread and used for an ever-increasing range of conditions, including those unrelated to serious disease or shortened life span, but this has not happened either. Critics of germline genome editing have argued that even if it were safe and effective, it would inevitably be abused by prospective parents who wish to improve upon what is already predicted to be a healthy outcome, and that this practice would become sufficiently widespread among those able to afford it that we would be creating a new genetic caste system. Before developing policy around such predictions, it is important to learn from the past.