Anti-Pdcd1 Monoclonal antibody, clone K54 [PerCP-eFluor® 710]

The lack of a specific marker differentiating early mycosis fungoides (eMF) from benign inflammatory dermatitis presents significant difficulties in the assessment and management of suspected MF patients, which often leads to delayed diagnosis and improper medical approaches. To address this, an investigation was carried out to characterize positive identification markers for eMF by comparing eMF lesions with healthy skin and benign inflammatory dermatitis, using high-throughput genomic transcription profiling. A total of 349 genes were differentially expressed in eMF lesions compared with normal skin. These genes belong to pathways associated with inflammation, immune activation, and apoptosis regulation. Most of them (N = 330) also demonstrated significant upregulation in chronic dermatitis, making them nonideal markers for eMF. Among them, 19 genes with specific enrichment in eMF lesions were identified that showed no significant upregulation in chronic dermatitis. Two of them, TOX and PDCD1, showed high discrimination power between eMF lesions and biopsies from benign dermatitis by RNA expression. Furthermore, TOX demonstrated highly specific staining of MF cells in eMF skin biopsies in immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence, including the early epidermotropic cells in Pautrier's microabscesses. This study demonstrates the potential of eMF-enriched genes, especially TOX, as molecular markers for histological diagnosis of eMF, which currently is a major diagnostic challenge.

Several multiple, large-scale, genetic studies on autoimmune-disease-associated SNPs have been reported recently: peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (PADI4) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); solute carrier family 22 members 4 and 5 (SLC22A4 and 5) in RA and Crohn's disease (CD); programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), and RA; and protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 22 (PTPN22) in T1D, RA, and SLE. Because these reports on association were not always evaluated in multiple ethnic groups and because ethnic difference in allele frequency of the variants has been also reported, we investigated allele frequencies of nine SNPs in four autoimmune-disease-associated loci in Caucasian, African-descent, and Japanese populations. Although SNPs in PADI4 had similar allele frequency among three groups [maximal difference 11%; (P > 0.05)], the other three loci revealed statistically significant allele frequency differences (maximal difference 39% (P < 0.00001), 13% (P < 0.00001), and 8% (P < 0.00001) in SLC22A4, PDCD1, and PTPN22, respectively). Of note, three SNPs in the three loci that had allele frequency more than 8% in the Caucasian population were either not polymorphic at all or extremely rare in the Japanese population. Our data suggest that ethnic variations of polymorphisms should be evaluated in detail, and differences should be incorporated into investigations of susceptibility variants for common diseases.