Rabbit Anti-Human PAK1 (internal) Polyclonal antibody

The group I p21-activated kinase (PAK) isoforms PAK1 and PAK2 are activated in response to insulin in skeletal muscle and PAK1/2 signalling is impaired in insulin-resistant mouse and human skeletal muscle. Interestingly, PAK1 has been suggested to be required for insulin-stimulated glucose transporter 4 translocation in mouse skeletal muscle. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the role of PAK1 in insulin-stimulated muscle glucose uptake. The pharmacological inhibitor of group I PAKs, IPA-3 partially reduced (-20%) insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in isolated mouse soleus muscle (P < 0.001). However, because there was no phenotype with genetic ablation of PAK1 alone, consequently, the relative requirement for PAK1 and PAK2 in whole-body glucose homeostasis and insulin-stimulated muscle glucose uptake was investigated. Whole-body respiratory exchange ratio was largely unaffected in whole-body PAK1 knockout (KO), muscle-specific PAK2 KO and in mice with combined whole-body PAK1 KO and muscle-specific PAK2 KO. By contrast, glucose tolerance was mildly impaired in mice lacking PAK2 specifically in muscle, but not PAK1 KO mice. Moreover, while PAK1 KO muscles displayed normal insulin-stimulated glucose uptakein vivoand in isolated muscle, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was slightly reduced in isolated glycolytic extensor digitorum longus muscle lacking PAK2 alone (-18%) or in combination with PAK1 KO (-12%) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, glucose tolerance and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake partly rely on PAK2 in glycolytic mouse muscle, whereas PAK1 is dispensable for whole-body glucose homeostasis and insulin-stimulated muscle glucose uptake.

Purpose Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that exhibits antitumor effects in preclinical studies, and as such is currently being repositioned for cancer treatment. However, divergences exist regarding its employed doses in preclinical works. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether the antitumor effects of ivermectin are observable at clinically feasible drug concentrations. Methods Twenty-eight malignant cell lines were treated with 5 mu M ivermectin. Cell viability, clonogenicity, cell cycle, cell death and pharmacological interaction with common cytotoxic drugs were assessed, as well as the consequences of its use on stem cell-enriched populations. The antitumor in vivo effects of ivermectin were also evaluated. Results The breast MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and MCF-7, and the ovarian SKOV-3, were the most sensitive cancer cell lines to ivermectin. Conversely, the prostate cancer cell line DU145 was the most resistant to its use. In the most sensitive cells, ivermectin induced cell cycle arrest at G(0)-G(1) phase, with modulation of proteins associated with cell cycle control. Furthermore, ivermectin was synergistic with docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and tamoxifen. Ivermectin reduced both cell viability and colony formation capacity in the stem cell-enriched population as compared with the parental one. Finally, in tumor-bearing mice ivermectin successfully reduced both tumor size and weight. Conclusion Our results on the antitumor effects of ivermectin support its clinical testing.