Anti-IFNG monoclonal antibody, clone YNH2.3 [Alexa Fluor® 647]

Endometriosis is a common disorder of unknown etiology, and non-surgical therapies are still a challenge. To understand the pathogenesis and preclinical testing of drugs for endometriosis, animal models are highly desirous. Herein, we carried out longitudinal characterization of a mouse model for endometriosis where uterine tissue was transplanted onto the intestinal mesentery. During the course of lesion development from day 15 to 60 post-induction, the ectopic endometrium became pale, fluid-filled and the animals developed peritoneal adhesions. Most lesions resembled a well-differentiated type of endometriosis and similar to 13% of animals had mixed type of lesions. There was extensive stromal compaction in the ectopic tissue. During the progression of endometriosis, there was increased proliferation of epithelial and stromal cells as evident by PCNA staining.Cyp19a1(aromatase) mRNA was detected in the ectopic lesions on day 15 and 30 post-induction of endometriosis, by day 60 the expression was reduced. As compared to the control endometrium, the mRNA levels ofEsr1progressively reduced while the levels of inflammation associated genes (Esr2, Ifng, TnfandIl1b)increased in the ectopic lesions. Infiltration of macrophages and polymorphonuclear leucocytes was also observed in the ectopic lesions indicative of inflammation. As compared to control, there was no change in levels of Cytokeratin and E-cadherin in the epithelial cells of ectopic endometrium. We did not observe excessive collagen deposition or alpha-SMA positive myofibroblasts in the stroma of the ectopic endometrium. Thus, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fibrosis are not detected in the mouse model of endometriosis. Our results show that the mouse model of endometriosis mimics some but not all the features of human endometriosis.

Trachoma, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is the world's leading infectious cause of blindness and remains a significant public health problem. Much of trachomatous disease pathology is thought to be caused indirectly by host cellular and immune responses, however the immune response during active trachoma and how this initiates progressive scarring is not clearly understood. Defining protective vs. pathogenic immune response to C. trachomatis is important for vaccine design and evaluation. This study reports the baseline results of a longitudinal cohort of Tanzanian children, who were monitored for 4 years in order to determine the immunofibrogenic and infectious correlates of progressive scarring trachoma. In this cohort baseline, 506 children aged 6-10 years were assessed for clinical signs, infection status and the expression of 91 genes of interest prior to mass azithromycin administration for trachoma control. C. trachomatis was detected using droplet digital PCR and gene expression was measured using quantitative real-time PCR. The prevalence of follicles, papillary inflammation and scarring were 33.6, 31.6, and 28.5%, respectively. C. trachomatis was detected in 78/506 (15.4%) individuals, 62/78 of whom also had follicles. C. trachomatis infection was associated with a strong upregulation of IFNG and IL22, the enrichment of Th1 and NK cell pathways and Th17 cell-associated cytokines. In individuals with inflammation in the absence of infection the IFNG/IL22 and NK cell response was reduced, however, pro-inflammatory, growth and matrix factors remained upregulated and mucins were downregulated. Our data suggest that, strong IFNG/IL22 responses, probably related to Th1 and NK cell involvement, is important for clearance of C. trachomatis and that the residual pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic phenotype that persists after infection might contribute to pathological scarring. Interestingly, females appear more susceptible to developing papillary inflammation and scarring than males, even at this young age, despite comparable levels of C. trachomatis infection. Females also had increased expression of a number of IFN gamma pathway related genes relative to males, suggesting that overexpression of this pathway in response to infection might contribute to more severe scarring. Longitudinal investigation of these factors will reveal their relative contributions to protection from C. trachomatis infection and development of scarring complications.