Anti-KRT18 monoclonal antibody, clone DZ-91

The focus of the presented work was to isolate and characterize circulating endometrial cells (CECs) enriched from peripheral blood (PB) of patients with diagnosed endometriosis. The molecular characteristics of CECs could be supportive for an understanding of endometriosis pathogenesis and treatment decisions in the future. Material and Methods: Blood samples (n = 423) were tested for CECs presence. Subsequently, gene expression analysis (GEA) was carried out for CECs. In parallel, CECs presence and characteristics were tested during menstrual cycle (MC) phases in 11 patients. CECs were enriched by size-based separation. Results: CECs were present in 78.4% of the tested blood samples. In line with the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) classification, CECs presence was confirmed in all the acknowledged endometriosis stages: minimal, mild, moderate, and severe. Surprisingly, CECs negativity rate was also reported for severe disease in 21.1% of cases. The CECs captured during MC phases displayed different cytomorphology, including epithelial, stromal, and stem cell-like characteristics. The highest CECs numbers were detected in the mid-secretory phase of MC, which corresponds to uterine lining decidualization. CECs captured during mid-secretory periods expressed genes KRT18, NANOG, and VIM in higher amounts when compared to the proliferative phase of MC, where genes KRT19 and ESR1 were mostly elevated. GEA of the super-positive CECs samples (1000 CECs/8 mL PB) revealed high expression of genes KRT18, VIM, NANOG, and FLT1. The expression of these genes was also elevated in the endometriosis tissue samples and endometrioma. Conclusion: The panel of the identified CEC genes could be tested in a prospective manner to confirm the role of CECs in endometriosis pathogenesis and diagnostics.

Objective: To develop a protocol for cryopreservation and recovery of human endometrial epithelial cells (eECs) retaining molecular and functional characteristics of endometrial epithelium in vivo. Design: In vitro study using human endometrial cells. Setting: University research laboratory. Patient(s): Endometrial biopsies were obtained from premenopausal women undergoing benign gynecologic procedures. Intervention(s): Primary eECs were cryopreserved in 1% fetal bovine serum/10% dimethylsulfoxide in Defined Keratinocyte SerumFree Medium (KSFM). Recovered cells were observed for endometrial stromal fibroblast (eSF) contamination and subsequently evaluated for morphology, gene expression, and functional characteristics of freshly cultured eECs and in vivo endometrial epithelium. Main Outcome Measure(s): Analysis of eEC morphology and the absence of eSF contamination; evaluation of epithelial-specific gene and protein expression; assessment of epithelial polarity. Result(s): Endometrial epithelial cells recovered after cryopreservation (n = 5) displayed epithelial morphology and expressed E-cadherin (CDH1), occludin (OCLN), claudin1 (CLDN1), and keratin18 (KRT18). Compared with eSF, recovered eECs displayed increased (P<.05) expression of epithelial-specific genes AREG, CDH1, DEFB4A, MMP7, and WNT7A, while exhibiting low-to-undetectable (P<.05) stromal-specific genes COL6A3, HOXA11, MMP2, PDGFRB, and WNT5A. Recovered eECs secreted levels of cytokines and growth factors similarly to freshly cultured eECs. Recovered eECs could form a polarized monolayer with high transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and impermeability to small molecules, and expressed apical/basolateral localization of CDH1 and apical localization of OCLN. Conclusion(s): We have developed a protocol for cryopreservation of eECs in which recovered cells after thawing demonstrate morphologic, transcriptomic, and functional characteristics of human endometrial epithelium in vivo. (C) 2016 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.