The epithelial cell response to health and disease associated oral biofilm models
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
Authors: Ramage, G.; Lappin, D. F.; Millhouse, E.; Malcolm, J.; Jose, A.; Yang, J.; Bradshaw, D. J.; Pratten, J. R.; Culshaw, S.
Abstract
Background and ObjectiveDifferent bacteria differentially stimulate epithelial cells. Biofilm composition and viability are likely to influence the epithelial response. In vitro model systems are commonly used to investigate periodontitis-associated bacteria and their interactions with the host; therefore, understanding factors that influence biofilm-cell interactions is essential. The present study aimed to develop in vitro monospecies and multispecies biofilms and investigate the epithelial response to these biofilms. Material and MethodsBacterial biofilms were cultured in vitro and then either live or methanol-fixed biofilms were co-cultured with epithelial cells. Changes in epithelial cell viability, gene expression and cytokine content of culture supernatants were evaluated. ResultsBacterial viability was better preserved within mixed-species biofilm culture than within single-species biofilm culture. Both mixed- and single-species biofilms stimulated increased expression of mRNA for interleukin 8 (IL8), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 3 (CXCL3), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), interleukin 1 (IL1), interleukin 6 (IL6), colony-stimulating factor 2 (CSF2) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF), and the response was greatest in response to mixed-species biofilms. Following co-culture, cytokines detected in the supernatants included IL-8, IL-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, with the greatest release of cytokines found following co-culture with methanol-fixed, mixed-species biofilms. ConclusionsThese data show that epithelial cells generate a distinct cytokine gene- and protein-expression signature in response to live or fixed, single- or multispecies biofilms.
Interferon regulatory factor 8/interferon consensus sequence binding protein is a critical transcription factor for the physiological phenotype of microglia
JOURNAL OF NEUROINFLAMMATION
Authors: Horiuchi, Makoto; Wakayama, Kouji; Itoh, Aki; Kawai, Kumi; Pleasure, David; Ozato, Keiko; Itoh, Takayuki
Abstract
Background: Recent fate-mapping studies establish that microglia, the resident mononuclear phagocytes of the CNS, are distinct in origin from the bone marrow-derived myeloid lineage. Interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8, also known as interferon consensus sequence binding protein) plays essential roles in development and function of the bone marrow-derived myeloid lineage. However, little is known about its roles in microglia. Methods: The CNS tissues of IRF8-deficient mice were immunohistochemically analyzed. Pure microglia isolated from wild-type and IRF8-deficient mice were studied in vitro by proliferation, immunocytochemical and phagocytosis assays. Microglial response in vivo was compared between wild-type and IRF8-deficient mice in the cuprizon-induced demyelination model. Results: Our analysis of IRF8-deficient mice revealed that, in contrast to compromised development of IRF8-deficient bone marrow myeloid lineage cells, development and colonization of microglia are not obviously affected by loss of IRF8. However, IRF8-deficient microglia demonstrate several defective phenotypes. In vivo, IRF8-deficient microglia have fewer elaborated processes with reduced expression of IBA1/AIF1 compared with wild-type microglia, suggesting a defective phenotype. IRF8-deficient microglia are significantly less proliferative in mixed glial cultures than wild-type microglia. Unlike IRF8-deficient bone marrow myeloid progenitors, exogenous macrophage colony stimulating factor (colony stimulating factor 1) (M-CSF (CSF1)) restores their proliferation in mixed glial cultures. In addition, IRF8-deficient microglia exhibit an exaggerated growth response to exogenous granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (colony stimulating factor 2) (GM-CSF (CSF2)) in the presence of other glial cells. IRF8-deficient microglia also demonstrate altered cytokine expressions in response to interferon-gamma and lipopolysaccharide in vitro. Moreover, the maximum phagocytic capacity of IRF8-deficient microglia is reduced, although their engulfment of zymosan particles is not overtly impaired. Defective scavenging activity of IRF8-deficient microglia was further confirmed in vivo in the cuprizone-induced demyelination model in mice. Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate the essential contribution of IRF8-mediated transcription to a broad range of microglial phenotype. Microglia are distinct from the bone marrow myeloid lineage with respect to their dependence on IRF8-mediated transcription.