Development the Care Evaluation Scale Version 2.0: a modified version of a measure for bereaved family members to evaluate the structure and process of palliative care for cancer patient
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE
Authors: Miyashita, Mitsunori; Aoyama, Maho; Nakahata, Misato; Yamada, Yuji; Abe, Mutsumi; Yanagihara, Kazuhiro; Shirado, Akemi; Shutoh, Mariko; Okamoto, Yoshiaki; Hamano, Jun; Miyamoto, Aoi; Yoshida, Saki; Sato, Kazuki; Hirai, Kei; Morita, Tatsuya
Abstract
Background: The Care Evaluation Scale (CES1.0) was designed to allow bereaved family members to evaluate the structure and process of care, but has been associated with a high frequency of misresponses. The objective of this study was to develop a modified version of CES1.0 (CES2.0) that would eliminate misresponses while maintaining good reliability and validity. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey by mail in October 2013. The participants were bereaved family members of patients who died from cancer in seven institutions in Japan. All family members were asked to complete CES2.0, the short form CES1.0, items on overall care satisfaction, the Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care (FAMCARE) Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ). To examine test- retest reliability, all participants were asked to complete a second CES2.0. Results: Of 596 questionnaires sent, 461 (77%) were returned and 393 (66%) were analyzed. In the short form CES1.0, 17.1% of the responses were identified as misresponses. No misresponses were found in CES2.0. We identified 10 CES2.0 subscales similar to those in CES1.0 using exploratory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha was 0.96, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83. Correlations were found between CES2.0 and overall satisfaction (r = 0.83) and FAMCARE (r = 0.58). In addition, total CES2.0 scores were negatively correlated with the PHQ 9 (r = - 0.22) and BGQ (r = - 0.10). Conclusion: These results suggest that CES2.0 eliminated misresponses associated with CES1.0 while maintaining good reliability and validity and greatly improving test- retest reliability.
A new class of mammalian carboxylesterase CES6
COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY D-GENOMICS & PROTEOMICS
Authors: Holmes, Roger S.; Cox, Laura A.; VandeBerg, John L.
Abstract
Mammalian carboxylesterases (CES) exhibit broad substrate specificities, catalyse hydrolytic and transesterification reactions with a wide range of drugs and xenobiotics and are widely distributed in the body. Four CES classes have been previously described, namely CES1 (major liver form); CES2 (major intestinal form); CES3 (highest activity in the colon): and CES5, a secreted enzyme found in mammalian kidney and male reproductive fluids. In silica methods were used to predict the amino acid sequences, structures and gene locations for a new class of CES genes and proteins, designated as CES6. Mammalian CES6 amino acid sequence alignments and predicted secondary and tertiary structures enabled the identification of key CES sequences previously reported for human CES1, but with CES6 specific sequences and properties: high isoelectric points (pI values of 8.8-9.4 compared with 5.4-6.2 for human CES1, CES2, CES3 and CES5); being predicted for secretion into body fluids compared with human CES1, human CES2 and CES3, which are membrane bound; and having Asn or Glu residues at the predicted CES1 Z-site for which a Gly residue plays a major role in cholesterol binding. Mammalian CES6 genes are located in tandem with CES2 and CES3 genes, are transcribed on the positive DNA strand and contain 14 exons. Human and mouse CES6-like transcripts have been previously reported to be widely distributed in the body but are localized in specific regions of the brain, including the cerebellum. CES6 may play a role in the detoxification of drugs and xenobiotics in neural and other tissues of the body and in the cerebrospinal fluid. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.