Anti-ABCC4 monoclonal antibody, clone 7B8I4

Multidrug resistance protein (MRP) 4 transports a variety of endogenous and xenobiotic organic anions. MRP4 is widely expressed in the body and specifically localized to the renal apical proximal tubule cell membrane, where it mediates the excretion of these compounds into urine. To characterize the MRP4 substrate-binding site, the amino acids Phe(368), Phe(369), Glu(374), Arg(375), and Glu(378) of transmembrane helix 6, and Arg(998) of helix 12, localized in the intracellular half of the central pore, were mutated into the corresponding amino acids of MRP1 and MRP2. Membrane vesicles isolated from human embryonic kidney 293 cells overexpressing these mutants showed significantly reduced methotrexate (MTX) and cGMP transport activity compared with vesicles that expressed wildtype MRP4. The only exception was substitution of Arg375 with serine, which had no effect on cGMP transport but significantly decreased the affinity of MTX. Substitution of the same amino acid with a positively charged lysine returned the MTX affinity to that of the wild type. Furthermore, MTX inhibition of MRP4-mediated cGMP transport was noncompetitive, and the inhibition constant was increased by introduction of the R375S mutation. A homology model of MRP4 showed that Arg(375) and Arg(998) face right into the central aqueous pore of MRP4. We conclude that positively charged amino acids in transmembrane helices 6 and 12 contribute to the MRP4 substrate-binding pocket.

Clinically relevant resistance to the currently approved camptothecins, irinotecan and topotecan, is poorly understood but may involve increased expression of ATP-dependent drug transporters such as ABCG2 (breast cancer resistant protein, BCRP). Gimatecan (ST1481) is a lipophilic 7-substituted camptothecin derivative that exhibits potent anti-tumor activity in a variety of preclinical cancer models and is under investigation in the clinic. Previous studies reported that gimatecan cytotoxicity was not affected by expression of ABCG2. To confirm and extend this finding, we assessed the cytotoxicity of gimatecan in pairs of isogenic cell lines consisting of transfectants expressing either ABCG2 (including wild-type, R482T, or R482G mutants), ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein), ABCC1 (MRP1), ABCC2 (MRP2), or ABCC4 (MRP4). Expression of wild-type or mutant ABCG2 in human cell lines conferred resistance to topotecan but not to gimatecan. Similarly, intracellular accumulation of gimatecan was unaffected by expression of wild-type ABCG2. Furthermore, expression of P-glycoprotein or MRP2 did not alter gimatecan cytotoxicity. Whereas expression of MRP1 had a minor effect on gimatecan cytotoxicity, expression of ABCC4 was found to significantly reduce the anti-proliferative effects of this drug. Cells containing resistance-conferring mutations in topoisomerase I were also resistant to gimatecan. These results suggest that gimatecan may be more effective than irinotecan or topotecan in cancers that express ABCG2, but not in cancers that express high levels of ABCC4 or contain certain topoisomerase I (TOP1) mutations.