Mouse Anti-Human WT1 monoclonal antibody, clone JID796

Background. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and its soluble form (suPAR) are new injury biomarkers that have been recently suggested to play a vital role in renal diseases. Aim and Methods. We evaluated the expression of uPAR and the serum concentration of suPAR in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) to determine the role of this molecule as a biomarker in DKD. The uPAR immunohistochemical staining was performed in biopsy-confirmed DKD renal tissues. Meanwhile, the serum suPAR, Interleukin-18 (IL-18) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of 70 diabetic patients with or without DKD and 15 healthy controls were measured. Results. The uPAR expression in DKD patients was significantly increased compared to that in healthy controls and was widely colocalized with the podocyte marker WT1. Meanwhile, serum suPAR and IL-18 levels gradually increased as DKD progressed to the advanced stage. Moreover, serum suPAR and IL-18 levels were negatively correlated with eGFR (rho = -0.734, rho = -0.462, p <0.01) and positively correlated with the urine protein to creatinine ratio (UP/CR) (rho = 0.730, rho -= 0.440, p <0.01). The suPAR AUC performed better than the IL-18 AUC for the diagnosis of proteinuria (0.845 vs. 0.753, p <0.01) and the decline of renal function (0.895 vs. 0.796, p <0.01). Conclusions. The uPAR expressed in the renal tissues of DKD patients. The soluble form of uPAR, suPAR, can be detected in the serum of DKD patients and has a better diagnostic efficiency in the diagnosis of proteinuria and renal dysfunction in patients with T2DM than that of IL-18. (C) 2019 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc.

One of the common indications of ascitic fluid examination in gynecological oncopathology is the detection and classification of malignant cells, especially in cases of clinically suspicious tubo-ovarian masses. The present study was undertaken to assess and validate the diagnostic utility of cell blocks (CBs) and compare its results with the corresponding conventional smears, prepared from effusion samples. CBs were prepared by thromboplastin technique in 220 cases. In 208 cases, diagnostic concordance between results obtained from smears and corresponding CBs was evaluated. Various antibody markers were tested, as per individual case. The average age of patients was 52.2 years. Positive immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for various markers was observed in 182 cases (82.7%) The most frequently positive antibody marker was PAX8 (101/134), followed by p53 (85/92) [mutation type (either diffusely positive or completely negative)], WT1 (tumor cells) (80/112), calretinin (2/87) (diffuse), BerEP4 (21/49), CA125 (21/24), CK7 (31/39) and CK20 and CDX2, together (5/16). Various other IHC markers utilized, including their positive expression, were TTF1 (1/10), p40 (3/3), p63 (2/4), ER (21/29), HBME1 (1/7), GATA3 (1/4), and MIC2 (1/1). Complete diagnostic concordance between CBs and smears was observed in 170/208 cases (81.7%). There were 20 major discordances, 10 minor and 8 cases with sampling errors. IHC was useful in classifying 158/182 (86.8%) cases, including serous or Mullerian adenocarcinoma (n = 123), mostly high-grade (121); metastatic squamous carcinoma (3); gastrointestinal-type adenocarcinoma (8); pulmonary adenocarcinoma (1); breast adenocarcinoma (1); Ewing sarcoma (1); and mesothelioma (2). CBs are complementary to smears in the detection of gynecological malignancies, mostly high-grade serous adenocarcinomas. These provide an opportunity for testing several IHC markers, for a precise diagnosis, including in various uncommon case scenarios, associated with significant therapeutic implications.