Loading ......
The Nipah virus (NiV) is classified within the Paramyxoviridae family and the Henipavirus genus. This enveloped RNA virus from the NiV family possesses a monomeric negative-sense genome that spans 18.2 kb and produces six structural proteins. In the early stages of infection humans got the disease from contact with pigs and experienced deadly brain inflammation that resulted in death rates between 38.5% and 100%. Fruit bats from the genus Pteropus serve as the natural host with transmission to intermediate hosts like pigs or humans happening through contaminated food or direct contact. Certain strains including the Bangladesh lineage possess the ability to transmit between humans.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the viral structure and genome organization
(Source: Sun B, et al. 2018)
NiV has an incubation period lasting between 4 and 21 days which results in severe acute encephalitis and respiratory illnesses that lead to high mortality rates. The initial incubation period ends with the appearance of prodromal symptoms including fever and headache while patients experience myalgia. Within a week patients start showing encephalitis symptoms which include altered mental status together with absent reflexes, hypotonia, segmental myoclonus, gaze palsy and limb weakness. Patients quickly worsen after the onset of the disease and succumb to comatose states before death occurs in just a few days. Survivors experience lasting neurological impairments such as fatigue and focal neurological deficits and depression in 20% of cases. Some differences exist in clinical features between Malaysian and Indian outbreaks. Mortality rates in India and Bangladesh (70%) are higher than in Malaysia (40%). Respiratory diseases occur in 70% of patients in India and Bangladesh, while no severe respiratory manifestations were observed in Malaysia. Symptoms of respiratory involvement include coughing along with respiratory distress and unusual pneumonia. Old age combined with comorbidities and thrombocytopenia with elevated aminotransferases upon admission as well as brainstem involvement and seizures contribute to poor prognosis risk factors.
The Henipavirus stands out as the single zoonotic paramyxovirus that displays both extensive host range capabilities and a high fatality rate. The virus infects its host by traveling through the oronasal route. Initial viremia allows the virus to spread throughout the body while secondary replication occurs in vascular endothelial cells. NiV pathogenicity stems directly from its distinctive molecular processes. The virus attaches to Ephrin-B2/B3 surface receptors on host cells using the G protein which activates F protein-driven membrane fusion resulting in vascular endothelial cells and neurons infection that causes vascular leakage, encephalitis and multi-organ failure. Ephrin-B2 is expressed on endothelial and smooth muscle cells, with higher levels in the brain, followed by the lungs, placenta, prostate, and blood vessels in various other tissues. This receptor distribution explains the clinical and pathological features of the disease. During embryonic development, Ephrin-B2 plays a crucial role in the migration of neuronal precursors. Consequently, it is highly conserved across different animal species, with receptor similarity reaching approximately 95%-96% between bats and pigs. This also contributes to NiV's broad host range. Studies indicate that the P gene products can inhibit interferon activity. Another study demonstrates that NiV infection suppresses interferon production but has minimal impact on interferon signaling transduction.
Figure 2. The Nipah virus life cycle and molecular targets for pharmacologic agents
(Source: Hauser N, et al. 2021)
As a core protein for viral entry, the G protein plays a pivotal role in receptor recognition, immune evasion, and vaccine design. NiV G protein is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein that functions as a receptor-binding protein. Its C-terminal globular head domain adopts a unique six-bladed β-propeller configuration, formed by six lobe modules interconnected via disulfide bonds to create a stable antiparallel β-sheet structure. This structural feature distinguishes it from attachment glycoproteins of other paramyxoviruses (such as the HN protein of parainfluenza virus), particularly in the conformational differences of the receptor-binding domain. Crystallographic studies reveal that the G protein head specifically binds to host cell receptors Ephrin-B2/B3 through a hydrophobic pocket and hydrogen-bond network, with residues Y120, P122, L124, and W125 forming a critical hydrophobic channel essential for receptor recognition. The G protein maintains a discoid structure when unbound but undergoes separation between its head and stalk domains upon Ephrin binding which reveals its interface for F protein interaction.
Ephrin B2 functions as a ligand for Eph receptors and performs essential functions in developmental processes within vascular and nervous systems as a cell surface glycoprotein. This protein shows increased expression within specific tumor cells. This receptor distribution well explains NiV's cellular and tissue tropism in vivo, along with its broad cellular tropism in cultured tumor cells. Ephrin B3 is considered an alternative receptor for NiV. Since ephrin B3 is expressed in some brain regions where the primary entry receptor ephrin B2 is absent, it may partially account for central nervous system pathologies observed in NiV patients.
The G protein is essential for F protein-mediated membrane fusion. Unlike most other paramyxoviruses, NiV G protein lacks hemagglutinin and neuraminidase activity and does not bind carbohydrates. Receptor binding by G protein triggers conformational changes, prompting its stalk α-helical domain to specifically interact with the prefusion conformation of F protein. This interaction induces structural rearrangements in F protein, driving its hydrophobic fusion peptide insertion into the host cell membrane and ultimately mediating viral envelope-cell membrane fusion.
Cryo-electron microscopy studies reveal that only one head domain in the G tetramer participates in receptor binding, while the remaining three heads orient toward the viral membrane, forming an asymmetric activation pattern. This dynamic regulatory mechanism not only enhances receptor recognition efficiency but may also maintain viral particle stability by preventing premature F protein activation.
The interaction between G and F proteins is transient. Recent studies demonstrate that G-F complexes remain unstable on cell surfaces prior to receptor binding, with their coordination relying on dynamic conformational coupling rather than static complex formation. This discovery challenges the traditional "stable complex" model and provides new insights for designing small-molecule inhibitors targeting membrane fusion.
The result of an infection depends on how well the host cell's innate immune responses react to attack in comparison to the microorganism's ability to avoid or suppress these defenses. Specifically, NiV among Henipaviruses produces multiple viral factors that accomplish this function throughout their life cycle. In vitro studies demonstrate that NiV infection of endothelial cell lines induces the production and secretion of multiple host antiviral proteins, type I interferons (IFN-I), inflammatory chemokines, and cytokines. Following initial attachment and fusion of NiV with the host cell membrane, cytoplasmic RNA helicases recognize the released viral genomic RNA, triggering robust activation of IFN-I responses.
Neutrophils are among the first immune cells recruited to infection sites. These cells employ neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) along with antiviral substances to enclose the virus. Certain NiV proteins suppress IFN signaling through their interaction with the JAK/STAT pathway. Virus entry through ephrin-B2/B3 receptors leads to NiV uptake by antigen-presenting cells like macrophages and dendritic cells which convert it into viral peptides. T cells become activated when viral peptides bind to MHC molecules through TCR engagement. Activated helper T cells play a critical role in initiating B cell activation and proliferation while promoting mature antibody response development. Consequently, plasma cells and memory B cells are generated, producing NiV-specific antibodies that protect against infection. Meanwhile, activated cytotoxic T cells target and eliminate NiV-infected cells.
Figure 3. Mechanism of host immune response in NiV infection
(Source: Wong WF, et al. 2022)
The G protein employs a dual strategy for immune evasion: On one hand, its highly glycosylated surface structure masks neutralizing epitopes, reducing antibody recognition efficiency. On the other hand, the secreted G protein (sG) acts as a "molecular decoy" to neutralize host-specific antibodies while mimicking the CX3CL1 chemokine to interfere with CX3CR1+ immune cell recruitment. Studies reveal that the CX3C motif in G protein exhibits high homology with the chemotactic functional domain of host CX3CL1. This molecular mimicry mechanism not only facilitates viral attachment but also suppresses the interferon signaling pathway, creating a microenvironment favorable for viral replication.
As a primary protective antigen, the G protein has garnered significant attention in vaccine design. Studies demonstrate that eliciting immune responses against Nipah virus envelope glycoproteins can achieve complete disease protection. The conserved central domain (CCD) of G protein harbors multiple linear neutralizing epitopes. Antibodies targeting this region block CX3C-CX3CR1 interactions while avoiding interference with normal chemokine function. Animal experiments reveal that recombinant G protein vaccines combined with prefusion F protein significantly elevate neutralizing antibody titers and reduce vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) risks through Th1-biased immune responses.
Novel vaccine strategies, such as pairing non-glycosylated G protein (eG) with CpG adjuvants, maintain immunogenicity while effectively avoiding side effects like eosinophil infiltration. However, G protein's high variability remains a major challenge. Although its core domain is relatively conserved, antigenic drift in the C-terminal hypervariable region may lead to immune evasion. Current explorations include multivalent vaccine designs and structure-guided antigen chimerism-for example, combining conserved epitopes from different viral strains' G proteins with nanoparticle carriers to broaden immune protection coverage.
Hamster-based research has shown preliminary support for passive immunotherapy using antibodies targeting viral envelope glycoproteins. The human monoclonal antibody m102.4 serves as an effective post-exposure treatment against NiV infection after being isolated from a recombinant naïve human phage-displayed Fab library. The monoclonal antibody m102.4 demonstrates strong neutralizing activity against both Nipah virus and Hendra virus.
Figure 4. Model of the Hendra virus soluble G glycoprotein subunit vaccine (HeV-sG) and its complex with the Henipavirus-neutralizing human monoclonal antibody m1024
(Source: Broder CC, et al. 2013)
References
| Target | Cat. No. | Product Name | Host | Isotype | Application | |
| NIV G Protein | DMAB-A001 | Mouse Anti-Nipah Virus G Protein monoclonal antibody, clone D12085N | Mouse | IgG1 | ELISA | Inquiry |
| DMAB-A002 | Mouse Anti-Nipah Virus G Protein monoclonal antibody, clone D12086N | Mouse | IgG1 | ELISA | Inquiry | |
| CABT-L11VR | Rabbit Anti-Nipah virus (NiV) Glycoprotein polyclonal antibody | Rabbit | IgG | WB | Inquiry | |
| NIV gF | CABT-L1230M | Mouse Anti-Nipah Virus Glycoprotein F monoclonal antibody, clone DH22 | Mouse | IgG | WB, ELISA | Inquiry |
| Target | Cat. No. | Product Name | Expression System | Tag/Conjugate | Application | |
| Nipah Virus | DAG-WT381 | Recombinant Nipah Virus (NiV) VLP | HEK293 | Unconjugated | Immunoassays | Inquiry |
| DAG-WT271 | Recombinant Nipah Virus G Protein [Fc] | HEK 293 | Fc | SDS-PAGE | Inquiry | |
| DAG-WT272 | Recombinant Nipah Virus F Protein [Fc] | HEK 293 | Fc | SDS-PAGE | Inquiry | |
| DAG-WT273 | Recombinant Nipah Virus Nucleoprotein [His] | HEK 293 | His | ELISA | Inquiry | |
| DAGA-1004 | Recombinant Nipah Virus G Protein | Insect cells | TBD | ELISA | Inquiry | |
| DAG-WT633 | Recombinant Nipah Virus F Protein [His] | HEK293 | His | ELISA | Inquiry | |
| DAG-WT634 | Recombinant Nipah Virus G Protein [His] | HEK293 | His | ELISA | Inquiry | |
| DAG-WT1059 | Recombinant Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G | Insect cells | Unconjugated | Immunoassays | Inquiry |
Loading ......