Recombinant HCV type 3b Nonstructural Protein 5 (a.a. 2212-2313) [GST]

Objective. Cellular immune responses are difficult to detect in the peripheral blood of persons with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We sought to determine whether T cell responses were present in the liver of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HCV coinfection. Methods. T cells were expanded from liver-biopsy samples from 10 patients coinfected with HIV and HCV (median CD4(+) cell count, 456 cells/mm(3)) and 8 patients infected with HCV alone. CD8(+) cell responses were detected by use of a modified enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay with recombinant vaccinia virus, and CD4(+) cell responses were detected by use of ELISpot with recombinant HCV proteins core, nonstructural (NS) 3, and NS5. Results. Intrahepatic CD8(+) cell responses to HCV were detected in 7 of 10 patients coinfected with HCV and HIV (median frequency, 638 spot-forming cells [sfc]/1 x 10(6) cells) and were similar to those observed in patients singly infected with HCV (7/8; median, 647 sfc/1 x 10(6) cells). Intrahepatic HCV-specific CD4(+) cell responses were also comparable in both groups and correlated with the intrahepatic CD8(+) cell responses (r = 0.59; P = .03). Conclusion. HCV-specific CD8(+) cell responses are present in the liver of persons with chronic HCV infection even when they are coinfected with HIV; these correlate with intrahepatic HCV-specific CD4(+) cell responses.

Genotyping of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA can be performed by a variety of methods following polymerase chain reaction amplification of a stable RNA portion of the genome. The gold standard is amplification of the RNA from the NS5 region, followed by direct sequencing and homology comparison. This method is extremely labor intensive. In this study, we compared an immunoblot serotyping technique (HCV STA) to a reverse-hybridization line-probe assay (LiPA) for genotype classification among non-alcoholic HCV infected patients. We then compared and contrasted the response in this cohort to a population of alcoholic patients with HCV infection. To validate the serotype assay, sera from 110 patients with chronic HCV infection was utilized. Serotyping (Chiron SIA) and genotyping by the LiPA (Line Probe Assay, Innogenetics) reverse-hybridization technique was performed. Additionally, both methods were compared to sequence-derived genotyping in 26 patients based on PCR amplification of the NS5 region. After the validation phase, sera from 105 alcoholic patients was genotypically classified by the serologic method. The nonalcoholic and alcoholic groups were then compared with regard to serotype, demographics, and frequency of untypable test results. Among typable pairs, the overall concordance rate between serotyping and LiPA-based genotyping was 93.75%. Patients with genotype 1 by reverse hybridization demonstrated a 95.8% concordance with serotype. Untypable samples were present for both techniques, but since they occurred in different patients, the techniques were complementary Alcoholic patients were significantly more likely to be infected with untypable serotypes than those without a pattern of alcohol abuse. These patients were also more likely to be HCV RNA negative than sera from typable patients. Serotype 1 was associated with high HCV RNA titer and poor interferon treatment response among both nonalcoholic and alcoholic patients. An immunoblot method for the evaluation of genotype classification was rapid and easily performed compared to sequence-based genotyping. There was a high degree of concordance compared to reverse-hybridization and sequence-based genotype characterization methods, Failure to detect HCV RNA in the serum is associated with a higher likelihood of classification failure. This problem was particularly prevalent in the alcoholic population HCV RNA titers and treatment outcomes were strongly associated with serotype classification results, demonstrating clinical utility of this assay technique.