Capecitabine and Temozolomide versus FOLFIRI in RAS-Mutated, MGMT-Methylated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Authors: Pietrantonio, Filippo; Lobefaro, Riccardo; Antista, Maria; Lonardi, Sara; Raimondi, Alessandra; Morano, Federica; Mosconi, Stefania; Rimassa, Lorenza; Murgioni, Sabina; Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea; Tomasello, Gianluca; Longarini, Raffaella; Farina, Gabriella; Petrelli, Fausto; Gori, Stefania; Randon, Giovanni; Corallo, Salvatore; Pagani, Filippo; Guarini, Vincenzo; Palermo, Federica; Martinetti, Antonia; Macagno, Marco; Barault, Ludovic; Perrone, Federica; Tamborini, Elena; Milione, Massimo; Di Nicolantonio, Federica; Di Maio, Massimo; Fuca, Giovanni; Di Bartolomeo, Maria; de Braud, Filippo
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether second-line therapy with capecitabine and temozolomide was superior to irinotecan, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) in patients with RAS-mutated, methyl-guanine methyltransferase (MGMT)-methylated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods: In this randomized, phase II trial, we enrolled patients with RAS-mutated, MGMT-methylated mCRC after failure of oxaliplatin-based regimen. Patients with centrally confirmed MGMT methylation were stratified by first-line progression-free survival (PFS) and prior bevacizumab and randomized to either capecitabine plus temozolomide (arm A, CAPTEM) or FOLFIRI (arm B). The primary endpoint was PFS analyzed on intention-to-treat basis, with 90% power and one-sided significance level of 0.05 to detect an increase of median time from 2 months in arm B to 4 months in arm A. Results: Between November 2014 and May 2019, 86 patients were randomly assigned to arm A (n = 43) or arm B (n = 43). After a median follow-up of 30.5 months (interquartile range, 12.2-36.3), 79 disease progression or death events occurred. Superiority of arm A was not demonstrated (one-sided P = 0.223). Progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 (2.0-5.0) and 9.5 (8.2-25.8) in arm A versus 3.5 (2.3-6.1) and 10.6 (8.5-20.8) in arm B [HR = 1.19 (0.82-1.72) and HR = 0.97 (0.58-1.61)], respectively. Grade >= 3 treatment-related adverse events had higher incidence in arm B versus A (47.6% vs 16.3%), and quality of life was significantly worse in arm B. Patients with positive MGMT expression by IHC did not benefit from CAPTEM. Conclusions: Temozolomide-based therapy warrants further investigation in molecularly hyperselected subgroups.
A "Clickable" Probe for Active MGMT in Glioblastoma Demonstrates Two Discrete Populations of MGMT
CANCERS
Authors: Raghavan, Sudhir; Baskin, David S.; Sharpe, Martyn A.
Abstract
Various pathways can repair DNA alkylation by chemotherapeutic agents such as temozolomide (TMZ). The enzyme O-6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) removes O-6-methylated DNA adducts, leading to the failure of chemotherapy in resistant glioblastomas. Because of the anti-chemotherapeutic activities of MGMT previously described, estimating the levels of active MGMT in cancer cells can be a significant predictor of response to alkylating agents. Current methods to detect MGMT in cells are indirect, complicated, time-intensive, or utilize molecules that require complex and multistep chemistry synthesis. Our design simulates DNA repair by the transfer of a clickable propargyl group from O-6-propargyl guanine to active MGMT and subsequent attachment of fluorescein-linked PEG linker via "click chemistry." Visualization of active MGMT levels reveals discrete active and inactive MGMT populations with biphasic kinetics for MGMT inactivation in response to TMZ-induced DNA damage.