anti-RhD Polyclonal antibody

Background: Ebola virus disease (EVD) was endemic to Africa in 2014-2016. Supportive therapies have been shown to improve the outcome of EVD, and additional supportive therapy including blood transfusion therapy and external circulation could be needed in the event of a future global outbreak. However, pre-transfusion testing policies and guidelines have not yet been established in Japan. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of blood transfusion therapy for EVD patients at three designated hospitals for serious communicable diseases in Tokyo. In each hospital, we surveyed blood transfusion therapy policy, blood transfusion protocol, presence of a specialist in the department of transfusion medicine, facility capacity for pre-transfusion compatibility testing, and types of personal protective equipment available. Results: One hospital had a cross-matched compatible blood transfusion policy, one had a cross-matched compatible blood transfusion policy only when the patient's ABO and RhD type is previously known, and the third had not created a policy. Two hospitals had a department of transfusion medicine. These two hospitals had a special testing unit for serious communicable diseases, while the other had a portable unit for testing. There were no major differences noted in available personal protective equipment. Conclusion: Policies and protocols differ among hospitals. The choice of blood transfusion policy and pre-transfusion testing is largely dependent on equipment and human resources. Further discussion is required to develop national guidelines for blood transfusion therapy in patients with serious communicable diseases, including countermeasures against complications and ethical issues related to the safety of patients and healthcare workers. (c) 2019 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background - The Rh system is the largest and most polymorphic blood group system. The existence of a large number of RH alleles results in variant phenotypes that often complicate blood donor phenotyping and the distinction between auto- and alto-antibodies in recipients who have anti-Rh antibodies in the presence of their own corresponding Rh antigen. Knowledge of these variants is necessary in order to make blood transfusion safer. Materials and methods - Samples from 48 blood donors with serological weak D and from 29 patients who had anti-Rh antibody in the presence of their own corresponding Rh antigen were evaluated molecularly for RHD and RHCE alleles using a blood-multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay and Sanger sequencing. Results - Rh variants were found in 45 of the 48 blood donors: 24/45 (53%) were weak D, 2/45 (4%) partial D and 19/45 (42%) were weak and partial D. The remaining three donors (6%) did not show a mutation in the RHD allele. Among the 29 patients, 13/29 had anti-e, of whom 4/13 had genotypes that predicted a partial e antigen; 11/29 had anti-D, with 6/11 being identified as partial D; 2/29 had anti-c, of whom 1/2 was predicted to express partial c antigen; 4/29 who had anti-E and 4/29 who had anti-C did not show mutations in RHCE*C or RHCE*E. Discussion - It was possible to find individuals with clinically significant Rh phenotypes due to the weak reactivity of the D antigen, detected through serological tests in blood donors. In patients, when found with the anti-Rh antibody in the presence of the same Rh antigen, it is difficult to distinguish an auto-antibody from an alto-antibody by serological tests; in these cases, molecular methods (genotyping) can help us to determine whether there are changes in the RH alleles and to discover the nature of the antibody (alto or auto).