A novel urinary biomarker protein panel to identify children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction - A pilot study
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY
Authors: Devarakonda, Charan Kumar, V; Shearier, Emily R.; Hu, Chaoran; Grady, James; Balsbaugh, Jeremy L.; Makari, John H.; Ferrer, Fernando A.; Shapiro, Linda H.
Abstract
Introduction and objective Reliable urinary biomarker proteins would be invaluable in identifying children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) as the existing biomarker proteins are inconsistent in their predictive ability. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify consistent and reliable urinary biomarker proteins in children with UPJO. Methods To identify candidate biomarker proteins, total protein from age-restricted (<2 years) and sex-matched (males) control (n=22) and UPJO (n=21) urine samples was analyzed by mass spectrometry. Proteins that were preferentially identified in UPJO samples were selected (2-step process) and ranked according to their diagnostic odds ratio value. The top ten proteins with highest odds ratio values were selected and tested individually by ELISA. The total amount of each protein was normalized to urine creatinine and the median with interquartile ranges for control and UPJO samples was determined. Additionally, fold change (UPJO/Control) of medians of the final panel of 5 proteins was also determined. Finally, we calculated the average + 3(SD) and average + 4(SD) values of each of the 5 proteins in the control samples and used it as an arbitrary cutoff to classify individual control and UPJO samples. Results In the first step of our selection process, we identified 171 proteins in UPJO samples that were not detected in the majority of the control samples (16/22 samples, or 72.7%). Of the 171 proteins, only 50 proteins were detected in at least 11/21 (52.4%) of the UPJO samples and hence were selected in the second step. Subsequently, these 50 proteins were ranked according to the odds ratio value and the top 10 ranked proteins were validated by ELISA. Five of the 10 proteins - prostaglandin-reductase-1, ficolin-2, nicotinate-nucleotide pyrophosphorylase [carboxylating], immunoglobulin superfamily-containing leucine-rich-repeat-protein and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 were present at higher levels in the UPJO samples (fold-change of the median protein concentrations ranging from 2.9 to 9.4) and emerged as a panel of biomarkers to identify obstructive uropathy. Finally, the order of prevalence of the 5 proteins in UPJO samples is PTGR1>FCN2>QPRT>ISLR>VCAM1. Conclusion In summary, this unique screening strategy led to the identification of previously unknown biomarker proteins that when screened collectively, may reliably distinguish between obstructed vs. non-obstructed infants and may prove useful in identifying informative biomarker panels for biological samples from many diseases. [GRAPHICS]
Characterization of immune cell, endothelial, and renal responses upon experimental human endotoxemia
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS
Authors: van Poelgeest, Eveline P.; Dillingh, Marlous R.; de Kam, Marieke; Malone, Karen E.; Kemper, Marleen; Stroes, Erik S. G.; Burggraaf, Jacobus; Moerland, Matthijs
Abstract
Introduction: Although the effects of relatively high concentrations of endotoxin on endothelial activation/dysfunction and kidney markers has been described in literature, detailed insight in the LPS concentration-effect relationship, the magnitude, variability and timing of the response, and potential effects of endotoxemia on the kidneys is lacking. A study was performed to assess the effects of low-to moderate dose (0.5, 1 or 2 ng/kg) endotoxemia on the endothelium and kidneys as measured by a panel of novel highly sensitive kidney injury markers. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with single ascending doses of LPS (0.5, 1 or 2 ng/kg) administered to healthy male volunteers (3 cohorts of 8 subjects, LPS: placebo 6: 2). Endothelial measures included selectins, cell adhesion molecules, and thrombomodulin. Renal measures included novel, sensitive and specific biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Results: Endotoxin exposure resulted in consistent LPS dose-dependent responses in inflammatory markers, E- and P-Selectin, VCAM1, ICAM1, and thrombomodulin. The observed biological responses were transient, reaching a level of significance of at least< 0.01 in the highest dose group and with an effect size which was dependent on the administered LPS dose. LPS-induced inflammatory and endothelial effects did not translate into a change in renal damage biomarkers, although at 2 ng/kg LPS, subtle and transient biomarker changes were observed that may relate to (subclinical) tubular damage. Discussion: We demonstrated that administration of a single LPS dose of 2 ng/kg to healthy volunteers results in significant inflammatory and endothelial responses, without inducing clinically relevant signs of kidney injury. These findings support the application of the human endotoxemia model in future clinical pharmacology studies.