Rabbit Anti-Human EZH2 monoclonal antibody, clone 9I43M54

In diagnostic breast pathology, there is no reliable applicable immunostain to help discern atypical and in situ apocrine lesions from benign apocrine tissue. At present, the diagnosis of non-invasive apocrine lesions remains challenging with current diagnoses rendered based on discrete morphologic characteristics on conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining. Interobserver variability is significant even among subspecialists partly due to lack of adjuvant diagnostic immunohistochemical stains. Herein, we set to elucidate the potential utility of EZH2 and Ki-67 immunostains as tangible tools in non-invasive apocrine proliferations. A cohort of apocrine breast lesions [Benign apocrine hyperplasia (BAH), n = 10; Atypical apocrine hyperplasia (AAH), n = 16; Apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (ADCIS), n = 12] were subjected to EZH2 immunostaining and analyzed via H-scoring of nuclear expression. Mean H-scores for EZH2 progressively increased from BAH (23.5), to AAH (47.4) and ADCIS (196.4), and showed a significant difference utilizing the Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.0001). Further interrogation of Ki-67 demonstrated incremental expression from BAH to AAH and ADCIS at 1.6 %, 4.7 % and 24.7 %, respectively (p < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test), suggesting an association with increased proliferation. Our results demonstrate that a combination of EZH2 and Ki-67 immunostaining may be employed in differentiating among challenging apocrine breast lesions and suggest a putative diagnostic utility for EZH2 and Ki-67 in noninvasive apocrine breast lesions.

Histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs) have been shown to be dysregulated in multiple cancers including melanoma, and as they are abundant and easily detectable, they make ideal biomarkers. The aim of this study was to identify histone PTMs that could be potential biomarkers for melanoma diagnosis. Previously, we utilized mass spectrometry to identify histone PTMs that were dysregulated in matched melanoma cell lines and found two modifications, H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (histone H3K27me3) and H4 lysine 20 monomethylation (histone H4K20me), that were differentially expressed in the more aggressive compared to the less aggressive cell line. In this study, we performed immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays containing 100 patient tissue spots; 18 benign nevi, 62 primary, and 20 metastatic melanoma tissues. We stained for histone H3K27me3 and histone H4K20me to ascertain whether these histone PTMs could be used to distinguish different stages of melanoma. Loss of histone H4K20me was observed in 66% of malignant patient tissues compared to 14% of benign nevi. A majority (79%) of benign nevi had low histone H3K27me3 staining, while 72% of malignant patient tissues showed either a complete loss or had strong histone H3K27me3 staining. When we analyzed the staining for both marks together, we found that we could identify 71% of the benign nevi and 89% of malignant melanomas. Histone H3K27me3 or histone H4K20me display differential expression patterns that can be used to distinguish benign nevi from melanoma; however, when considered together the diagnostic utility of these PTMs increased significantly. The work presented supports the use of combination immunohistochemistry of histone PTMs to increase accuracy and confidence in the diagnosis of melanoma.