Rabbit Anti-Human ESR1 (Phospho-Ser305) polyclonal antibody

Resistance to tamoxifen is a clinically major challenge in breast cancer treatment. Although downregulation of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER alpha) is the dominant mechanism of tamoxifen resistance, the reason for ER alpha decrease during tamoxifen therapy remains elusive. Herein, we reported that Spalt-like transcription factor 2 (SALL2) expression was significantly reduced during tamoxifen therapy through transcription profiling analysis of 9 paired primary pre-tamoxifen-treated and relapsed tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer tissues. SALL2 transcriptionally upregulated ESR1 and PTEN through directly binding to the DNA promoters. By contrast, silencing SALL2 induced downregulation of ER alpha and PTEN and activated the Akt/mTOR signaling, resulting in estrogen-independent growth and tamoxifen resistance in ER alpha-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, hypermethylation of SALL2 promoter was found in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer. Importantly, in vivo experiments showed that DNA methyltransferase inhibitor-mediated SALL2 restoration resensitized tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer to tamoxifen therapy. These findings shed light on the mechanism of SALL2 in regulation of ER and represent a potential clinical signature that can be used to categorize breast cancer patients who may benefit from co-therapy with tamoxifen and DNMT inhibitor.

Approximately 70% of breast cancers, the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, are positive for the estrogen receptor (ER). Treatment of patients with luminal subtypes is mainly based on endocrine therapy. However, ER positivity is reduced and ESR1 mutations play an important role in resistance to endocrine therapy, leading to advanced breast cancer. Various methodologies for the detection of ESR1 mutations have been developed, and the most commonly used method is next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays (50.0%) followed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) (45.5%). Regarding the sample type, tissue (50.0%) was more frequently used than plasma (27.3%). However, plasma (46.2%) became the most used method in 2016-2019, in contrast to 2012-2015 (22.2%). In 2016-2019, ddPCR (61.5%), rather than NGS (30.8%), became a more popular method than it was in 2012-2015. The easy accessibility, non-invasiveness, and demonstrated usefulness with high sensitivity of ddPCR using plasma have changed the trends. When using these assays, there should be a comprehensive understanding of the principles, advantages, vulnerability, and precautions for interpretation. In the future, advanced NGS platforms and modified ddPCR will benefit patients by facilitating treatment decisions efficiently based on information regarding ESR1 mutations.