Long-term genome-wide blood RNA expression profiles yield novel molecular response candidates for IFN-beta-1b treatment in relapsing remitting MS
PHARMACOGENOMICS
Authors: Goertsches, Robert H.; Hecker, Michael; Koczan, Dirk; Serrano-Fernandez, Pablo; Moeller, Steffen; Thiesen, Hans-Juergen; Zettl, Uwe K.
Abstract
Aims: In multiple sclerosis patients, treatment with recombinant IFN-beta (rIFN-beta) is partially efficient in reducing clinical exacerbations. However, its molecular mechanism of action is still under scrutiny. Materials & methods: We used DNA microarrays (Affymetrix, CA, USA) and peripheral mononuclear blood cells from 25 relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients to analyze the longitudinal transcriptional profile within 2 years of rIFN-beta administration. Sets of differentially expressed genes were attained by applying a combination of independent criteria, thereby providing efficient data curation and gene filtering that accounted for technical and biological noise. Gene ontology term-association analysis and scientific literature text mining were used to explore evidence of gene interaction. Results: Post-therapy initiation, we identified 42 (day 2), 175 (month 1), 103 (month 12) and 108 (month 24) differentially expressed genes. Increased expression of established IFN-beta marker genes, as well as differential expression of circulating IFN-beta-responsive candidate genes, were observed. MS4A1 (CD20), a known target of B-cell depletion therapy, was significantly downregulated after one month. CMPK2, FCER1A, and FFAR2 appeared as hitherto unrecognized multiple sclerosis treatment-related differentially expressed genes that were consistently modulated over time. Overall, 84 interactions between 54 genes were attained, of which two major gene networks were identified at an earlier stage of therapy: the first (n = 15 genes) consisted of mostly known IFN-beta-activated genes, whereas the second (n = 12) mainly contained downregulated genes that to date have not been associated with IFN-beta effects in multiple sclerosis array research. Conclusion: We achieved both a broadening of the knowledge of IFN-beta mechanism-of-action-related constituents and the identification of time-dependent interactions between IFN-beta regulated genes.
MS4A1 Dysregulation in Asbestos-Related Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Is Due to CD20 Stromal Lymphocyte Expression
PLOS ONE
Authors: Wright, Casey M.; Francis, Santiyagu M. Savarimuthu; Tan, Maxine E.; Martins, Maria U.; Winterford, Clay; Davidson, Morgan R.; Duhig, Edwina E.; Clarke, Belinda E.; Hayward, Nicholas K.; Yang, Ian A.; Bowman, Rayleen V.; Fong, Kwun M.
Abstract
Asbestos-related lung cancer accounts for 4-12% of lung cancers worldwide. We have previously identified ADAM28 as a putative oncogene involved in asbestos-related lung adenocarcinoma (ARLC-AC). We hypothesised that similarly gene expression profiling of asbestos-related lung squamous cell carcinomas (ARLC-SCC) may identify candidate oncogenes for ARLC-SCC. We undertook a microarray gene expression study in 56 subjects; 26 ARLC-SCC (defined as lung asbestos body (AB) counts >20AB/gram wet weight (gww) and 30 non-asbestos related lung squamous cell carcinoma (NARLC-SCC; no detectable lung asbestos bodies; 0AB/gww). Microarray and bioinformatics analysis identified six candidate genes differentially expressed between ARLC-SCC and NARLC-SCC based on statistical significance (p<0.001) and fold change (FC) of >2-fold. Two genes MS4A1 and CARD18, were technically replicated by qRT-PCR and showed consistent directional changes. As we also found MS4A1 to be overexpressed in ARLC-ACs, we selected this gene for biological validation in independent test sets (one internal, and one external dataset (2 primary tumor sets)). MS4A1 RNA expression dysregulation was validated in the external dataset but not in our internal dataset, likely due to the small sample size in the test set as immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for MS4A1 (CD20) showed that protein expression localized predominantly to stromal lymphocytes rather than tumor cells in ARLC-SCC. We conclude that differential expression of MS4A1 in this comparative gene expression study of ARLC-SCC versus NARLC-SCC is a stromal signal of uncertain significance, and an example of the rationale for tumor cell enrichment in preparation for gene expression studies where the aim is to identify markers of particular tumor phenotypes. Finally, our study failed to identify any strong gene candidates whose expression serves as a marker of asbestos etiology. Future research is required to determine the role of stromal lymphocyte MS4A1 dysregulation in pulmonary SCCs caused by asbestos.