ERCC1 Knockout Cell Lysate

Background The introduction of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with either oxaliplatin or mitomycin C for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CPM) has resulted in a major increase in overall survival. Nonetheless, despite critical patient selection, the majority of patients will develop recurrent disease within one year following CRS + HIPEC. Therefore, improvement of patient and treatment selection is needed and may be achieved by the incorporation of genetic biomarkers. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of genetic biomarkers in the DNA repair pathway that are potentially predictive for treatment outcome of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with CRS + HIPEC with oxaliplatin or mitomycin C. Methods A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Given the limited number of genetic association studies of intraperitoneal mitomycin C and oxaliplatin in patients with CPM, we expanded the review and extrapolated the data from biomarker studies conducted in colorectal cancer patients treated with systemic mitomycin C- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Results In total, 43 papers were included in this review. No study reported potential pharmacogenomic biomarkers in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing mitomycin C-based chemotherapy. For oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, a total of 26 genetic biomarkers within 14 genes were identified that were signi?cantly associated with treatment outcome. The most promising genetic biomarkers wereERCC1rs11615,XPCrs1043953,XPDrs13181,XPGrs17655,MNATrs3783819/rs973063/rs4151330, MMR status, ATM protein expression,HIC1tandem repeat D17S5, andPIN1rs2233678. Conclusion Several genetic biomarkers have proven predictive value for the treatment outcome of systemically administered oxaliplatin. By extrapolation, these genetic biomarkers may also be predictive for the efficacy of intraperitoneal oxaliplatin. This should be the subject of further investigation.

Purpose: To investigate the biological and clinical significance of ribonucleotide reductase (RR) in multiple myeloma. Experimental Design: We assessed the impact of RR expression on patient outcome in multiple myeloma. We then characterized the effect of genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunit M1 (RRM1) on multiple myeloma growth and survival using siRNA and clofarabine, respectively, in both in vitro and in vivo mouse xenograft models. Results: Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with higher RRM1 expression have shortened survival. Knockdown of RRM1 triggered significant growth inhibition and apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells, even in the context of the bone marrow microenvironment. Gene expression profiling showed upregulation of DNA damage response genes and p53-regulated genes after RRM1 knockdown. Immunoblot and qRT-PCR analysis confirmed that gamma-H2A. X, ATM, ATR, Chk1, Chk2, RAD51, 53BP1, BRCA1, and BRCA2 were upregulated/activated. Moreover, immunoblots showed that p53, p21, Noxa, and Puma were activated in p53 wild-type multiple myeloma cells. Clofarabine, a purine nucleoside analogue that inhibits RRM1, induced growth arrest and apoptosis in p53 wild-type cell lines. Although clofarabine did not induce cell death in p53-mutant cells, it did trigger synergistic toxicity in combination with DNA-damaging agent melphalan. Finally, we demonstrated that tumor growth of RRM1-knock down multiple myeloma cells was significantly reduced in a murine human multiple myeloma cell xenograft model. Conclusions: Our results therefore demonstrate that RRM1 is a novel therapeutic target in multiple myeloma in the preclinical setting and provide the basis for clinical evaluation of RRM1 inhibitor, alone or in combination with DNA-damaging agents, to improve patient outcome in multiple myeloma. (C) 2017 AACR.