Methylomic Analysis of Ovarian Cancers Identifies Tumor-Specific Alterations Readily Detectable in Early Precursor Lesions
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Authors: Pisanic, Thomas R., II; Cope, Leslie M.; Lin, Shiou-Fu; Yen, Ting-Tai; Athamanolap, Pornpat; Asaka, Ryoichi; Nakayama, Kentaro; Fader, Amanda N.; Wang, Tza-Huei; Shih, Ie-Ming; Wang, Tian-Li
Abstract
Purpose: High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) typically remains undiagnosed until advanced stages when peritoneal dissemination has already occurred. Here, we sought to identify HGSOC-specific alterations in DNA methylation and assess their potential to provide sensitive and specific detection of HGSOC at its earliest stages. Experimental Design: MethylationEPIC genome-wide methylation analysis was performed on a discovery cohort comprising 23 HGSOC, 37 non-HGSOC malignant, and 36 histologically unremarkable gynecologic tissue samples. The resulting data were processed using selective bioinformatic criteria to identify regions of high-confidence HGSOC-specific differential methylation. Quantitative methylation-specific real-time PCR (qMSP) assays were then developed for 8 of the top-performing regions and analytically validated in a cohort of 90 tissue samples. Lastly, qMSP assays were used to assess and compare methylation in 30 laser-capture microdissected (LCM) fallopian tube epithelia samples obtained from cancer-free and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) positive women. Results: Bioinformatic selection identified 91 regions of robust, HGSOC-specific hypermethylation, 23 of which exhibited an area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) value >= 0.9 in the discovery cohort. Seven of 8 top-performing regions demonstrated AUC values between 0.838 and 0.968 when analytically validated by qMSP in a 90-patient cohort. A panel of the 3 top-performing genes (c17orf64, IRX2, and TUBB6) was able to perfectly discriminate HGSOC (AUC 1.0). Hypermethylation within these loci was found exclusively in LCM fallopian tube epithelia from women with STIC lesions, but not in cancer-free fallopian tubes. Conclusions: A panel of methylation biomarkers can be used to accurately identify HGSOC, even at precursor stages of the disease. (C) 2018 AACR.
Maternal whole blood mRNA signatures identify women at risk of early preeclampsia: a longitudinal study
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Authors: Tarca, Adi L.; Romero, Roberto; Erez, Offer; Gudicha, Dereje W.; Than, Nandor Gabor; Benshalom-Tirosh, Neta; Pacora, Percy; Hsu, Chaur-Dong; Chaiworapongsa, Tinnakorn; Hassan, Sonia S.; Gomez-Lopez, Nardhy
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether previously established mRNA signatures are predictive of early preeclampsia when evaluated by maternal cellular transcriptome analysis in samples collected before clinical manifestation. Materials and methods: We profiled gene expression at exon-level resolution in whole blood samples collected longitudinally from 49 women with normal pregnancy (controls) and 13 with early preeclampsia (delivery <34 weeks of gestation). After preprocessing and removal of gestational age-related trends in gene expression, data were converted into Z-scores based on the mean and standard deviation among controls for six gestational-age intervals. The average Z-scores of mRNAs in each previously established signature considered herein were compared between cases and controls at 9-11, 11-17, 17-22, 22-28, 28-32, and 32-34 weeks of gestation. Results: (1) Average expression of the 16-gene untargeted cellular mRNA signature was higher in women diagnosed with early preeclampsia at 32-34 weeks of gestation, yet more importantly, also prior to diagnosis at 28-32 weeks and 22-28 weeks of gestation, compared to controls (all, p < .05). (2) A combination of four genes from this signature, including a long non-protein coding RNA [H19 imprinted maternally expressed transcript (H19)], fibronectin 1 (FN1), tubulin beta-6 class V (TUBB6), and formyl peptide receptor 3 (FPR3) had a sensitivity of 0.85 (0.55-0.98) and a specificity of 0.92 (0.8-0.98) for prediction of early preeclampsia at 22-28 weeks of gestation. (3) H19, FN1, and TUBB6 were increased in women with early preeclampsia as early as 11-17 weeks of gestation (all, p < .05). (4) After diagnosis at 32-34 weeks, but also prior to diagnosis at 11-17 weeks, women destined to have early preeclampsia showed a coordinated increase in whole blood expression of several single-cell placental signatures, including the 20-gene signature of extravillous trophoblast (all, p < .05). (5) A combination of three mRNAs from the extravillous trophoblast signature (MMP11, SLC6A2, and IL18BP) predicted early preeclampsia at 11-17 weeks of gestation with a sensitivity of 0.83 (0.52-0.98) and specificity of 0.94 (0.79-0.99). Conclusions: Circulating early transcriptomic markers for preeclampsia can be found either by untargeted profiling of the cellular transcriptome or by focusing on placental cell-specific mRNAs. The untargeted cellular mRNA signature was consistently increased in early preeclampsia after 22 weeks of gestation, and individual mRNAs of this signature were significantly increased as early as 11-17 weeks of gestation. Several single-cell placental signatures predicted future development of the disease at 11-17 weeks and were also increased in women already diagnosed at 32-34 weeks of gestation.