Anti-STK11 (aa 321-433) polyclonal antibody

Introduction: Ten percent of NSCLCs harbor mutations in SMARCA4, the gene encoding the SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable ATPase BRG1. In preclinical models, BRG1 inactivation increases tumor aggressiveness but enhances sensitivity to drugs that target oxidative phosphorylation and inhibit SMARCA2, EZH2, CDK4, or CDK6. To facilitate translation of preclinical findings into clinical studies exploiting these therapeutic vulnerabilities, we assessed the clinical features of patients with tumors harboring BRG1-inactivating mutations. Methods: Data sets from Massachusetts General Hospital and Foundation Medicine were reviewed to determine the prevalence of SMARCA4-mutant NSCLC and describe its clinicopathologic characteristics. BRG1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with SMARCA4 mutations. Treatment outcomes were retrospectively assessed. Results: We detected SMARCA4 genomic alterations in 9% (n = 117 of 1422) and 11% (n = 3188 of 27,281) of NSCLCs in the institutional and Foundation Medicine data sets, respectively. In both cohorts, truncating mutations comprised over one-third of SMARCA4 alterations. Twenty-nine of 64 SMARCA4-mutant NSCLCs (45%) assessed for BRG1 expression reported loss of expression, most (90%) of which had truncating SMARCA4 mutations. Overall, 84% (n = 26 of 31) of evaluated NSCLCs with truncating SMARCA4 mutations lacked BRG1 expression. Deficient BRG1 expression was predominantly detected in adenocarcinomas with co-occurring mutations in KRAS, TP53, KEAP1, and STK11. Among patients with BRG1-deficient NSCLC who received first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy (n = 11) or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (n = 5), median progression-free survival was 38 days and 35 days, respectively. Conclusions: BRG1 deficiency is enriched in NSCLCs with truncating SMARCA4 mutations. Clinical outcomes are poor in this molecular subgroup, highlighting the importance of developing novel strategies to target unique vulnerabilities associated with the BRG1-deficient state. (C) 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

A hereditary predisposition to breast cancer significantly influences screening and follow-up care for high-risk women. A specific predisposing gene is identified in < 30% of cases, the majority of which are due to a rare high-penetrance gene mutation. Risk management guidelines are based on both clinical and genomic information. Next generation sequencing offers a new venue for risk assessment.A hereditary predisposition to breast cancer significantly influences screening and follow-up recommendations for high-risk women. However, in patients with a suggestive personal and/or family history, a specific predisposing gene is identified in < 30% of cases. Up to 25% of hereditary cases are due to a mutation in one of the few identified rare, but highly penetrant genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN, TP53, CDH1, and STK11), which confer up to an 80% lifetime risk of breast cancer. An additional 2%-3% of cases are due to a mutation in a rare, moderate-penetrance gene (e.g. CHEK2, BRIP1, ATM, and PALB2), each associated with a twofold increase in risk. Prediction models suggest that there are unlikely to be additional yet to be identified high-penetrance genes. Investigation of common, low-penetrance alleles contributing to risk in a polygenic fashion has yielded a small number of suggestive single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), but the contributive risk of an individual SNP is quite small. Mutation testing is currently recommended for individual genes in the appropriate clinical setting where there is a high index of suspicion for a specific mutated gene or syndrome. Next-generation sequencing offers a new venue for risk assessment. At the present time, there are clear clinical guidelines for individuals with a mutation in a high-penetrance gene. Otherwise, standard models are used to predict an individual's lifetime risk by clinical and family history rather than genomic information.