Anti-Collagen Type I/III polyclonal antibody

BackgroundAlport syndrome is a clinically heterogeneous nephropathy characterized by severe symptomatology at kidney level due to ultrastructural lesions of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) as consequence of mutations in COL4 genes. The disease has been linked to COL4A3/COL4A4/COL4A5 mutations, which impair GBM functionality and can be inherited in a dominant, recessive or X-linked transmission. Although a targeted Next Generation Sequencing approach has allowed identifying families with pathogenic mutations in more than one COL4 3-4-5 heterotrimer encoding genes, leading to conclude for a digenic pattern of inheritance, the role of non-collagen genes in digenic Alport syndrome has not yet been established.MethodsWe employed a whole-exome sequencing approach on three families in whom a digenic pattern of transmission could be suspected because of a likely biparental contribution or an unexplained phenotype in the proband.ResultsWe identified in the three probands hypomorphic LAMA5 mutations co-inherited with pathogenic COL4 4-5 chains mutations. Segregation analysis revealed that the combination of LAMA5/COL4 variants co-segregate with a fully penetrant phenotype in line with a digenic inheritance.In one of the three probands an hypomorphic variant in NPHS2 was also found, suggesting that role of other kidney disease related-genes as modifiers.ConclusionThese findings validate the impact of LAMA5 mutations in digenic ATS and highlight the role of extracellular matrix's genes, basement membrane, slit diaphragm and podocyte cytoskeleton in ATS. This underline the need for a more extensive panel approach in the presence of a digenic ATS, in order to better define clinical severity and recurrence risk for family members.

Collagen IV nephropathies (COL4Ns) comprise benign familial microscopic hematuria, thin basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN), X-linked Alport syndrome (AS) and also autosomal recessive and dominant AS. Apart from the X-linked form of AS, which is caused by hemizygous mutations in the COL4A5 gene, the other entities are caused by mutations in the COL4A3 or COL4A4 genes. The diagnosis of these conditions used to be based on clinical and/or histological findings of renal biopsies, but it is the new molecular genetics approach that revolutionised their investigation and proved particularly instrumental, especially, in many not so clear-cut cases. More recently, the spectrum of COL4N has expanded to include late onset focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) that develops on top of TBMN in later life. Also, other reports showed that some patients with a primary diagnosis of familial FSGS proved to have variants in COL4 genes. In the presence of a renal biopsy picture of FSGS and in the absence of either electron microscopy studies or molecular genetic studies that point to TBMN and COL4N, the patient and his family may be mistakenly diagnosed with hereditary FSGS leading to unnecessary further investigations, erroneous family counselling and improper corticosteroid treatment. TBMN is a frequent finding in the general population, and according to several recent reports, it may be the underlying cause and the explanation for many familial and sporadic cases of late-onset FSGS with non-nephrotic proteinuria. This is an important new finding that needs widespread recognition. It is anticipated that the molecular genetic analysis with next generation sequencing will certainly offer timely correct diagnosis. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel