Anti-Simian rotavirus Outer Capsid protein VP4 Polyclonal antibody

VP4 relationships of Australian porcine rotaviruses were identified using genetic reassortants and MAbs. All porcine virus isolates except BEN-144 appeared to share VP4 antigenicity with OSU virus. VP4 of BEN-144 virus (Gottfried-like virus) showed some antigenic relationship with the human neonatal viruses ST-3 and RV-3. In addition, VP4 of porcine CRW-8 showed antigenic relationships with simian SA-11, RRV and also canine K9 viruses, while that of porcine TFR-41 showed at least one way VP4 antigenic relatedness with UK bovine rotavirus. Furthermore, BMI-1 virus which is antigenically similar to an American virus SB1-A (a naturally occurring reassortant) may have arisen similarly by gene reassortment in nature in Australia.

Species A rotavirus (RVA) is an important gastrointestinal pathogen that is widely distributed in humans, mammalian animals and birds. The RVA genome consists of eleven double-stranded RNA segments, enabling the generation of novel strains with new pathogenic or antigenic features by genetic reassortment. While reassortants between human and mammalian animal RVAs have been repeatedly described, data on the re assortment potential of avian RVA strains are rare. To investigate genome segment exchanges between avian and mammalian RVA strains, a plasmid-based reverse genetics strategy originally developed for the simian RVA strain SA11 was used here. All eleven genome segments of the chicken RVA strain 02V0002G3 were cloned into similar plasmids as in the SA11 system. However, in contrast to SA11, no infectious virus could be generated by transfection of the eleven 02V0002G3 plasmids into cell culture under the same conditions. In another series of experiments, each of the genome segments of 02V0002G3 was transfected together with the remaining ten genome segments of SA11. Viable mono-reassortants were only retrieved for the avian VP3 and VP4 genes. The reassortant viruses were structurally indistinguishable from their parental viruses, but grew to slightly lower titers in cell culture. The results indicate that the VP3 and VP4 genes, but not the other genes of avian RVA, can functionally substitute their mammalian homologs and create viable reassortants. Further research should focus on the reasons behind the reassortment incompatibility and on the optimization of the system for the generation of viable avian RVA rescued entirely from cloned avian RVA genome segments.