The miR-155 regulates cytokines expression by SOSC1 signal pathways of fish in vitro and in vivo
FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
Authors: Tang, Xuelian; Fu, Jinghua; Tan, Xukai; Shi, Yunfeng; Ye, Jiawei; Guan, Wanting; Shi, Yifu; Xu, Minjun
Abstract
MiR-155 is reported as immune regulated miRNA in mammalian corresponding to immunity, antibacterial and antiviral effects regulation. However, the roles and mechanisms of the miRNA have remained largely undefined. We herein comprehensively investigated the functions of miR-155 in vitro and in vivo by miR-155 mimics, agomir and antagomir in Cyprinus carpio and Ictalurus punctatus, with the target genes in the SOSC1 pathway certified in I. punctatus via luciferase reporter assays. Results showed that the miR-155 regulated the expressions of cytokines, including TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, IL-1 beta, IL-6 and IL-10. Further research confirmed SOSC1 as one of the targets of the miRNA, and the JAK1/STAT3/SOSC1 signal pathway involved in the miR-155 effects on the expression of immune cytokines as well. Additionally, the changes of TLR2 in fish may also be related to miR-155 along with its target SOCS1, and the TLR2/MyD88 pathway may partly participate in the effects of the miR-155 on the cytokines. The research here confirmed that the miR-155 can regulate cytokines expression by SOSC1 signal pathways of fish in vitro and in vivo, which would provide resources for understanding and studying about immune regulation in fish.
Clinical context for cancer risk of immunosuppressive agents used in dermatology
DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY
Authors: Daugherty, Timothy Tyler; Swerlick, Robert Andrew
Abstract
Dermatologic care of inflammatory skin conditions has been transformed over recent decades through the use of small molecules disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and targeted biologic therapies. Alongside the tremendous benefit of these agents, concerns remain regarding possible side effects, particularly cancer risk. To improve guidance and counseling of patients with skin diseases who are considering treatment with such agents, this article reviews available information on the risk of malignancies in patients treated with these agents. When possible, this article adds clinical context to risk through a number needed to harm that estimates the number of patients a provider would need to treat with a given agent in 1 year to cause a single adverse outcome over time.