Anti-JAM3 monoclonal antibody, clone DSBN-29 G37 [Biotin]

Background: Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing in cervical cancer screening shows relatively low specificity, which makes triage testing necessary. In this study, DNA methylation analysis was compared with cytology for triage testing in hrHPV-positive women. Moreover, feasibility of DNA methylation analysis directly on brush-based self-sampled specimens was assessed. Methods: Non-responding women from population-based screening were invited to self-collect a cervico-vaginal specimen for hrHPV testing; hrHPV-positive women were referred to a physician for triage liquid-based cytology. DNA methylation analysis was performed on 128 hrHPV-positive physician-collected triage samples and 50 matched brush self-samples with QMSP for C13ORF18, EPB41L3, JAM3 and TERT. Results: In physician-taken triage material, DNA methylation analysis of JAM3 showed the highest combined specificity (88%) and sensitivity (82%) for detection of CIN3+, whereas cytology showed a specificity of 48% and a sensitivity of 91%. Out of 39 women with abnormal cytology and normal histology (false-positive by cytology), 87% were negative for JAM3 and 90% for C13ORF18 methylation. Agreement between DNA methylation analysis performed directly on the matched self-sampled material and physician-taken samples was 88% for JAM3 (kappa = 0.75, P<0.001) and 90% for C13ORF18 (kappa = 0.77; P<0.001). Conclusions: DNA methylation analysis as a triage test in hrHPV-positive women is an attractive alternative to cytology. Furthermore, DNA methylation is feasible directly on brush-based self-samplers and showed good correlation with matched physician-taken samples. Direct molecular triage on self-collected specimens could optimise the screening program, especially for non-responders, as this would eliminate the need for an additional physician-taken scraping for triage testing.

Objective. To explore the feasibility of DNA methylation analysis for the detection of cervical neoplasia in self-obtained cervico-vaginal lavages. Methods. Lavages collected by a self-sampling device and paired cervical scrapings were obtained from 20 cervical cancer patients and 23 patients referred with an abnormal cervical smear (15 with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) and 8 without CIN). All lavages and scrapings were analyzed by liquid based cytology (LBC), Hybrid Capture II (HC-II) for hr-HPV DNA detection and by DNA methylation analysis (JAM3, TERT, EPB41L3 and C13ORF18). Concordance between lavages and scrapings was measured by Cohen's Kappa (k). Results. In lavages and scrapings from cervical cancer patients (n =20), methylation analysis was positive in 19 (95%) and 19 (95%), HC-II in 16 (80%) and 15 (75%) and LBC in 15 (75%) and 19 (95%), respectively. In lavages and scrapings from CIN2+ patients (n = 15), methylation analysis was positive in 10 (67%) and 12 (80%), HC-II in 15 (100%) and 15 (100%) and LBC in 11 (73%) and 12 (80%), respectively. Concordance between cervical scrapings and lavages (n = 43) was for LBC k = 0.522 (p<0.001), hr-HPV testing k = 0.551 (p<0.001) and DNA methylation analysis k=0.653 (p<0.001). Conclusions. DNA methylation analysis in cervico-vaginal lavages obtained by a self-sampling device is feasible and its diagnostic performance appears to be at least comparable to the detection of cervical neoplasia by cytomorphology and hr-HPV. Our pilot study suggests that detection of cervical neoplasia by DNA methylation analysis in cervico-vaginal lavages warrants exploration of its use in large prospective studies. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.