Anti-pan Cytokeratin monoclonal antibody, clone HNM-92

Background: The clinicopathological and immunohistochemical data of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) from India are limited. Our objectives were to evaluate various histopathological parameters and immunomarkers to elucidate the best possible immunomarker combination that can accurately diagnose these tumors. Materials and Methods: Clinicopathological features of 33 consecutive cases of SPN were retrospectively analyzed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on a tissue microarray of 31 of these cases with antibodies to pan-cytokeratin (CK), vimentin, CD 10, E-cadherin, beta-catenin, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), chromogranin. Results: Totally, 32 of 33 patients were females with a mean age of 26 years (range 12-62 years). Majority presented with abdominal pain (93.93%) and/or abdominal mass (48.48%). Location in pancreas included tail (14), head (7), body and tail (6), body (5) and neck (1). The mean diameter of the tumor was 8.6 cm (range 0.5-16 cm). Surgical exploration was done in all cases. On IHC, tumor cells were consistently positive for vimentin and negative for chromogranin (100%). CK was positive in 12 cases (38.7%), CD 10 showed perinuclear dot positivity in 14 (45.16%) cases and cytoplasmic positivity in 05 (16.12%) cases. All cases showed loss of membranous staining for both beta-catenin and E-cadherin with nuclear positivity in 90.32% and 70.16% cases, respectively. PR was positive in 20 (64.51%) cases, while all of them were negative for ER. Conclusion: Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm is a tumor commonly affecting young females. Loss of membrane expression of beta-catenin and E-cadherin with nuclear positivity can be used confirm the diagnosis of SPN.

Primary bladder leiomyosarcoma was diagnosed in a four-year-old, mixed-breed, spayed female cat that presented with lethargy, stranguria, polyuria, hematuria, urinary incontinence and abdominal sensitivity. On abdominal ultrasound, the urinary bladder was observed to have a preserved anatomical position and a hyperechoic mass. The mass measured approximately 1.5 cm, was irregular, and arose from the mucosa of the bladder wall. Due to the evidence of a primary tumor in the urinary bladder, we conducted a partial cystectomy with a 1.0 cm surgical margin and performed histopathology and immunohistochemistry. The histopathology revealed a poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm, characterized by the proliferation of spindle cells with moderate nuclear pleomorphism, suggestive of leiomyosarcoma. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the histopathological diagnosis, showing positive staining for vimentin, desmin and alpha-smooth muscle actin and negative staining for S100, pan-cytokeratin and MyoD1. We also assessed the proliferative index by Ki67 staining and found that 57% of the neoplastic cells were positive for Ki67. We conducted clinical follow-ups every three months in the first year and every six months thereafter. The patient showed no signs of recurrence after 48 months. The surgery was sufficient to treat the leiomyosarcoma, and adjuvant chemotherapy was not necessary in this case.