Rabbit Anti-Human mGluR6 (a.a. 501-600) Polyclonal antibody

Background: There is increasing interest in the pharmacogenetic basis for explaining differences between patients in treatment outcome among methadone-treated subjects. Most studies have focused on genetic polymorphisms related to methadone pharmacokinetics and, to a lesser extent, those genes implicated in the pharmacodynamics of methadone. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the associations between response to methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and polymorphisms in genes coding for the OPRM1 opioid receptor, the metabotropic glutamate receptors GRM6 and GRM8, the nuclear receptor NR4A2, the photolyase enzyme cryptochrome 1 (CRY 1), and the transcription factor myocardin (MYOCD), which have previously been associated with the risk of opioid dependence disorder. Methods: The study used an association, case-control design, conducted in the setting of an MMT program in a drug abuse outpatient center in Barcelona, Spain. We recruited 169 opioid-dependent patients (diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [4th Edition] criteria) receiving MMT. The inclusion criteria included Caucasian ethnicity, being enrolled in MMT for at least 6 months, and receiving a stable methadone dose for the previous 2 months. The exclusion criteria included language-related barriers, severe cognitive impairment, or any medical disorder that would interfere with the research assessments. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants in several candidate genes and regions were genotyped: MYOCD (rs1714984), GRM8 (rs1034576), CRY1 (rs1861591), GRM6 (rs953741), OPRM1 (rs1074287), NR4A2 (rs1405735), and the intergenic variants rs965972 (1q31.2) and rs1867898 (2q21.2). MMT response status was assessed by the number of opioid-positive controls detected by random urinalysis in the previous 2 months. We used the chi-squared test and p-value for the allele frequencies of the eight SNPs in responders versus nonresponders, and multivariate logistic regression analyses' to examine associations between genotypes in the responder and ronresponder groups under codominant, dominant, and recessive models of inheritance. Results: A final sample of 116 opioid-dependent patients were included and classified as methadone responders (n = 83) and nonresponders (n = 33), according to illicit opioid use detection in random urinalysis. The responders and nonresponders showed similar demographic and clinical characteristics. All SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Subjects carrying the AA genotype at rs1861591 (CRY1; Chr 12: 105941056 G>A) had a higher risk of being nonresponders (odds ratio [OR] = 2.99; 95% CI 1.14, 7.85; p = 0.035), although this difference disappeared with multiple testing corrections. Patients carrying the A allele at rs1714984 (MYOCD; Chr 17: 12558425 G>A) had an increased risk of being nonresponders only if they were also carriers of the AG genotype at rs953741 (GRM6; Chr5: 178262451 A>G) [OR = 10.83; 95% CI 2.52, 46.66; p = 0.006]. Conclusions: A positive association was observed between response to methadone and two variants in the genes MYOCD and GRM6. A pharmacogenetic epistatic effect between SNPs in MYOCD and GRM6 appears to modulate inter-individual variations in MMT response.

Objective: To investigate the relative frequency of the genetic causes of the Schubert-Bornschein type of congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) and to determine the genotype-phenotype correlations in CSNB1 and CSNB2. Design: Clinic-based, longitudinal, multicenter study. Participants: A total of 39 patients with CSNB1 from 29 families and 62 patients with CSNB2 from 43 families. Methods: Patients underwent full ophthalmologic and electrophysiologic examinations. On the basis of standard electroretinograms (ERGs), patients were diagnosed with CSNB1 or CSNB2. Molecular analysis was performed by direct Sanger sequencing of the entire coding regions in NYX, TRPM1, GRM6, and GPR179 in patients with CSNB1 and CACNA1F and CABP4 in patients with CSNB2. Main Outcome Measures: Data included genetic cause of CSNB, refractive error, visual acuity, nystagmus, strabismus, night blindness, photophobia, color vision, dark adaptation (DA) curve, and standard ERGs. Results: A diagnosis of CSNB1 or CSNB2 was based on standard ERGs. The photopic ERG was the most specific criterion to distinguish between CSNB1 and CSNB2 because it showed a "square-wave" appearance in CSNB1 and a decreased b-wave in CSNB2. Mutations causing CSNB1 were found in NYX (20 patients, 13 families), TRPM1 (10 patients, 9 families), GRM6 (4 patients, 3 families), and GPR179 (2 patients, 1 family). Congenital stationary night blindness 2 was primarily caused by mutations in CACNA1F (55 patients, 37 families). Only 3 patients had causative mutations in CABP4 (2 families). Patients with CSNB1 mainly had rod-related problems, and patients with CSNB2 had rod-and cone-related problems. The visual acuity on average was better in CSNB1 (0.30 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) than in CSNB2 (0.52 logMAR). All patients with CSNB1 and only 54% of the patients with CSNB2 reported night blindness. The dark-adapted threshold was on average more elevated in CSNB1 (3.0 log) than in CSNB2 (1.8 log). The 3 patients with CABP4 had a relative low visual acuity, were hyperopic, had severe nonspecific color vision defects, and had only 1.0 log elevated DA threshold. Conclusions: Congenital stationary night blindness 1, despite different causative mutations, shows 1 unique CSNB1 phenotype. Congenital stationary night blindness 2 caused by mutations in CABP4 merely shows conerelated problems and therefore appears to be distinct from CSNB2 caused by mutations in CACNA1F.