Anti-CD80 monoclonal antibody, clone JM-B260

Excessive monocyte/macrophage activation with the development of a cytokine storm and subsequent acute lung injury, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), is a feared consequence of infection with COVID-19. The ability to recognize and potentially intervene early in those patients at greatest risk of developing this complication could be of great clinical utility. In this study, we performed flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood samples from 34 COVID-19 patients in early 2020 in an attempt to identify factors that could help predict the severity of disease and patient outcome. Although we did not detect significant differences in the number of monocytes between patients with COVID-19 and normal healthy individuals, we did identify significant morphologic and functional differences, which are more pronounced in patients requiring prolonged hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Patients with COVID-19 have larger than normal monocytes, easily identified on forward scatter (FSC), side scatter analysis by routine flow cytometry, with the presence of a distinct population of monocytes with high FSC (FSC-high). On more detailed analysis, these CD14(+)CD16(+), FSC-high monocytes show features of mixed M1/M2 macrophage polarization with higher expression of CD80(+)and CD206(+)compared with the residual FSC-low monocytes and secretion of higher levels of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha, when compared with the normal controls. In conclusion, the detection and serial monitoring of this subset of inflammatory monocytes using flow cytometry could be of great help in guiding the prognostication and treatment of patients with COVID-19 and merits further evaluation.

PURPOSE. We previously have reported that ICP22, an immediate early gene of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), binds to the CD80 promoter to suppress CD80 expression in antigen-presenting cells, leading to reduced T-cell function and protection. In contrast, overexpression of CD80 exacerbates corneal scarring (CS) in ocularly infected mice. In this study we tested the hypothesis that the absence of ICP22 could increase disease severity. METHODS. To test our hypothesis, BALB/c mice were ocularly infected after corneal scarification with a recombinant HSV-1 lacking the ICP22 gene with its parental wild-type (WT) virus (KOS) as a control. Virus replication in the eye, CS, angiogenesis, latency, and reactivation between ICP22 null virus and WT KOS were determined. In addition, expression of IL-2, IL-4, IFN-gamma, IFN-alpha, granzyme A, granzyme B, and perforin by CD4 and CD8 T cells in corneas of infected mice on days 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28 postinfection were determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS. We found similar levels of eye disease and angiogenesis in mice following corneal scarification and ocular infection with the ICP22 null virus or parental WT virus despite reduced virus replication in the eye and reduced latency and reactivation in mice ocularly infected with ICP22 null virus. The similar level of eye disease in ICP22 null virus- and WT virus-infected mice correlated with expression of various proinflammatory cytokines that infiltrated the eye after HSV-1 infection. CONCLUSIONS. Our study identified a critical role for ICP22 in HSV-1 pathogenicity and suggests that HSV-1-associated CS is more dependent on host immune responses to infection than to virus replication in the eye. Thus, HSV-1 as means of survival uses ICP22 as a mechanism of immune escape that protects the host from increased pathology.