Loading ......
Smallpox, an epidemic disease of humans with a high mortality rate caused by variola virus (VAR), a member of the genus Orthopoxvirus of the family Poxviridae, is the only example of an infectious disease that was eradicated by the international community under the aegis of the World Health Organization. Two factors contributed to the success of this unprecedented campaign: the exclusively human host range of VAR and the availability of a highly effective and inexpensive live vaccine derived from the closely related vaccinia virus (VACV). Vaccinia virus (VACV) has been used more extensively for human immunization than any other vaccine. Research on VACV has produced a number of modified vaccines with improved safety profiles [1].
Smallpox was an infectious disease caused by variola virus (often called smallpox virus) which belongs to the genus orthopoxvirus, poxvirus family. They are unique among DNA viruses because they replicate only in the cytoplasm of the host cell, outside of the nucleus. Therefore, the large genome is required for encoding various enzymes and proteins involved in viral DNA replication and gene transcription. During its replication cycle, VV produces four infectious forms which differ in their outer membranes: intracellular mature virion (IMV), the intracellular enveloped virion (IEV), the cell-associated enveloped virion (CEV) and the extracellular enveloped virion (EEV). Although the issue remains contentious, the prevailing view is that the IMV consists of a single lipoprotein membrane, while the CEV and EEV are both surrounded by two membrane layers and the IEV has three envelopes. The IMV is the most abundant infectious form and is thought to be responsible for spread between hosts. On the other hand, the CEV is believed to play a role in cell-to-cell spread and the EEV is thought to be important for long range dissemination within the host organism [2-4].
The genome of orthopoxviruses is a double-stranded DNA with covalently closed ends, varying in length from 186 to 230 kbp. The central genomic region, with a length of about 100 kbp, containing 102 genes, is conserved for all of the species belonging to this genus. The species-specific distinctions of the orthopoxvirus genome are most pronounced in their terminal variable regions. The very first comparisons of the DNA nucleotide sequences of various VARV strains demonstrated a high conservation of their genomes and revealed specific differences between the South American and the studied Asian, Central African, and East African VARV strains. VARV has the smallest genome (186 kbp) among the orthopoxviruses and presumably evolved from an orthopoxvirus with a larger genome and a wide host range similar to cowpox virus via deletions and mutations in a number of genes localized to the terminal variable genomic regions [5,6].
VACV apparently replaced cowpox virus for use in vaccination some time in the 19th century. Because of the highly conserved nature of orthopoxvirus structural proteins, immunization with VACV provides cross-protection against variola and other orthopoxviruses, such as monkeypox.
Because all orthopoxviruses are antigenically related, immunization with nearly any orthopoxvirus can protect against challenge with other orthopoxviruses. In the late 1700s, Edward Jenner discovered that cowpox virus could be used successfully to protect humans against smallpox. Since vaccination with cowpox was much safer than variolation, it quickly became the primary method of conferring protection. Over time, VACV replaced cowpox virus as the agent used for vaccination. An intensified global smallpox eradication program was begun in 1966. The basic strategy for this program involved mass vaccination campaigns in each country and the development of surveillance systems to detect and contain outbreaks. Typically following vaccination, a vesicular or pustular skin lesion at the site of inoculation is indicative of a successful vaccination or "take" [7].
The use of live animals for the production of vaccine material has changed due to current unacceptability of this process and quality control issues regarding microbial contamination. This has led to the production of "second generation" smallpox vaccines using tissue culture systems or embryonated chicken eggs. However, experience with vaccine material produced in cell culture is limited.
ACAM2000TM is a "second generation" smallpox vaccine licensed for use in the United States as of August 2007. The vaccine was derived from plaque purification of a Dryvax@ isolate that was subsequently manufactured in the Vero monkey cell line. For the naïve population, the percentage of "takes" and complications using ACAM2000TM was similar to Dryvax@ vaccinees. ACAM2000TM was also found to be acceptable as a booster in those previously vaccinated for smallpox. Nevertheless, a significant minority of the population has contraindications that prevent pre-exposure use of "first" or "second generation" smallpox vaccines. Therefore substantial work is being directed toward the development of safer, yet immunogenic vaccines. These "third generation" vaccines involve genetically altering the VACV genome in order to create non-replicating or highly attenuated VACV strains that still retain their immunizing properties against smallpox [8].
One commonly used technique to attenuate VACVs involves multiple passaging of the wt viruses in tissue culture cells from alternative hosts, which has been shown to alter properties such as viral host range, virulence, and genome composition.
VACV LC16m8, DIs and MVA have all been obtained by passage on alternative hosts. Nonetheless, while there are some similarities among the three viruses, there are numerous differences as well. DIs and MVA were both obtained by passage in chicken cells, and both have large deletions in the host range determining region, which makes both viruses replication defective in most mammalian cells. These additional mutations in innate immune evasion genes in MVA may be responsible for the unique ability of this virus, among non-genetically engineered orthopoxviruses, to induce proinflammatory signal transduction, proinflammatory gene expression, and to lead to an increased migration of immune cells to the site of immunization. The ability of MVA to induce proinflammatory cytokines may have a profound influence on its ability to induce adaptive immunity. LC16m8 was obtained by passage through rabbit kidney cells, and rather than having large deletions it has one single base pair deletion in B5R, and likely has other small mutations that alter gene function to give the temperature restriction and low pathogenicity of this virus. LC16m8 has an intact host range determining region, and appears to be replication competent in most mammalian cells. As a replication competent virus LC16m8 may have properties closer to a wt-VACV than DIs or MVA. However, the failure to make EV may at least potentially affect the efficacy of LC16m8 as a replacement smallpox vaccine [9].
With the advances in biotechnology that allow insertion, deletion and interruption of genes in specific genomic sites, targeted attenuation of viruses became a practical goal. For VACV this has involved deletion of immune-modulating, host-range and accessory nucleotide metabolism genes, as well as deletion of essential genes, that can be complemented by cell lines expressing the targeted VACV gene. The goal of deleting genes from VACV is to attenuate the virus while maintaining or increasing immunogenicity. Measures that can be implemented include: Attenuation through deletion of immune modulating, accessory, or essential genes and Attenuation through insertion of immune-modulating genes [10].
The eradication of smallpox combined with the advent of genetically engineered recombinant poxvirus technology demonstrated the feasibility of using VACVs to protect against specific pathogens. With the relative ease of generating recombinant VACVs to express heterologous genes, widespread attention has been given to the idea of using these vectors as a vehicle for an antigen delivery system against different diseases. Replication-competent recombinant VACV-based vaccines have received increasing attention as potential vaccine vectors for many infectious diseases, since they are presumably able to elicit potent humoral and cell mediated immune responses, and confer lasting protection. Different approaches have been taken to lower the virulence and enhance the immune response in an effort to generate a safe vaccine platform. We are confident that continued efforts to genetically modify poxvirus vectors will not only improve our understanding of these viruses but also allow preservation of safety while taking advantage of the immunogenic benefits of replication competence.
References
Smallpox Virus
| Cat.No. | Product Name | Host | Application | |
| DPAB-DC4867 | Anti-Smallpox virus Protein J5 (N-terminus) Pab | Rabbit | ELISA, WB | Inquiry |
| DPAB-DC4868 | Anti-Smallpox virus Protein J5 (C-terminus) Pab | Rabbit | ELISA, WB | Inquiry |
| DPAB-DC4869 | Anti-Smallpox virus Protein J5 (internal) Pab | Rabbit | ELISA, WB | Inquiry |
| DPATB-H83286 | Anti-Smallpox virus A27L (a.a. 18-32) Pab | Rabbit | WB | Inquiry |
| DPATB-H83284 | Anti-Smallpox virus B5R (a.a. 180-194) Pab | Rabbit | WB | Inquiry |
| DPATB-H83283 | Anti-Smallpox virus B5R (a.a. 200-214) Pab | Rabbit | WB | Inquiry |
| DPATB-H83285 | Anti-Smallpox virus B5R (a.a. 33-47) Pab | Rabbit | WB | Inquiry |
| DMAB-CS23173 | Anti-Smallpox Virus B5R (a.a. 33-47) Mab, clone 2H3G4 | Mouse | WB | Inquiry |
Vaccinia Virus
Neutralizing antibodies
| Cat.No. | Product Name | Host | Application | |
| DMAB-CS23174 | Anti-Vaccinia virus A13 Mab, clone 11F7 | Rabbit | Neut, WB, ELISA, IF | Inquiry |
| DMAB-CS23175 | Anti-Vaccinia virus A13 Mab, clone 11F7 | Mouse | Neut, WB, ELISA, IF | Inquiry |
| DMAB-CS23176 | Anti-Vaccinia virus A13 Mab, clone 11F7 | Human | Neut, WB, ELISA, IF | Inquiry |
| DMAB-CS23177 | Anti-Vaccinia virus A13 Mab, clone 11F7 (IgM) | Human | Neut, WB, ELISA, IF | Inquiry |
Vaccinia Virus
| Cat.No. | Product Name | Expression System | |
| DAGC031 | Recombinant Vaccinia Virus CP77 [His] | E. coli | Inquiry |
| DAG2641 | Recombinant Vaccinia Virus Fc Chimera [His] | Insect cells | Inquiry |
| DAG2646 | Recombinant Vaccinia Virus CCI Fc Chimera | CHO | Inquiry |
| DAG-H10355 | Recombinant Vaccinia Virus B18R [His] | Insect cells | Inquiry |
Smallpox Virus
| Cat | Product Name | Expression System | |
| DAG2609 | Recombinant Smallpox virus Variola CRMB (a.a. 23-349) [His] | Mouse myeloma cells | Inquiry |
| DAG-WT1092 | Recombinant Smallpox virus A27L Protein [His] | HEK293 cells | Inquiry |
| DAG-WT1093 | Recombinant Smallpox virus L1 Protein [His] | HEK293 cells | Inquiry |
Loading ......