Anti-SLC40A1 polyclonal antibody

Purpose of review The anemia of inflammation has been associated for nearly two decades with elevated cytokine levels, but the primary mediator of this condition was unknown. Recently hepcidin antimicrobial peptide has emerged as the hormone that links the type 11 acute phase response to iron handling and erythropoiesis. Recent findings Hepcidin antimicrobial peptide likely modulates iron transport from macrophages and enterocytes to red blood cell precursors as a consequence of its interaction with SLC40A1/ferroportin, the only known transporter that facilitates iron egress. Insights into the regulation of hepcidin antimicrobial peptide expression by known iron metabolic proteins such as HFE, hemojuvelin, and transferrin receptor 2 are expanding the understanding of the genetic circuitry that controls iron absorption and utilization. Summary Increasingly, experiments suggest the hepatocyte is not just the iron storage depot but is the 'command central' for the maintenance of iron homeostasis. It receives multiple signals related to iron balance and responds via transcriptional control of hepcidin antimicrobial peptide.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemochromatosis leads to an increased lifetime risk for end-organ damage due to excess iron deposition. Guidelines recommend that genetic testing be performed in patients with clinical suspicion of iron overload accompanied by elevated serum ferritin and transferrin saturation levels. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate guideline adherence and the clinical and economic impact of HFE genetic testing. METHODS: The electronic charts of patients submitted for HFE testing in 2012 were reviewed for genetic testing results, biochemical markers of iron overload and clinical history of phlebotomy. RESULTS: A total of 664 samples were sent for testing, with clinical, biochemical and phlebotomy data available for 160 patients. A positive C282Y homozygote or C282Y/H63D compound heterozygote test result was observed in 18% of patients. Patients with an at-risk HFE genotype had significantly higher iron saturation, serum iron and hemoglobin (P < 0.001), without higher ferritin or liver enzyme levels. Fifty percent of patients referred for testing did not have biochemical evidence of iron overload (transferrin saturation >45% and ferritin level > 300 mu g/L). Patients were four times more likely to undergo phlebotomy if they were gene test positive (RR 4.29 [95% CI 2.35 to 7.83]; P < 0.00001). DISCUSSION: One-half of patients referred for testing did not exhibit biochemical evidence of iron overload. Many patients with biochemical evidence of iron overload, but with negative genetic test results, did not undergo phlebotomy. A requisition to determine clinical indication for testing may reduce the use of the HFE genetic test. Finally, improvement of current genetic test characteristics would improve rationale for the test. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of hemochromatosis genetic testing does not adhere to current guidelines and would not alter patient management.