Phospho-FGFR2 (Tyr653/654) Kit

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin remains the standard first-line systemic therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma and offers a median survival of approximately 1 year. No standard regimens beyond the first line and no targeted or immunotherapy agents are approved yet in this disease. Development of molecular targeted therapy in this heterogenous and relatively rare malignancy continues to be a challenging area The rapidly growing precision medicine efforts have uncovered the underlying mutational landscape of this lethal disease and paved the way for molecularly oriented clinical trials. The early results from such trials like those exploring IDH and FGFR2 derangements have highlighted its promising potential as alternative therapeutic options. Additionally, advances in cancer immunology have identified certain correlates as biomarkers of response to immune modulatory approaches. For instance, the presence of tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and/or microsatellite instability (MSI), in 5% to 10% of cholangiocarcinoma, is associated with high rates and durability of responses to immune checkpoint blockade. Beside checkpoint inhibitors, other types of immune therapeutics like peptide and dendritic cell-based vaccines and adoptive cell therapies have been developed and are undergoing active evaluation in cholangiocarcinoma. With further research effort, the integration of tumor molecular profiling in trials exploring targeted immunotherapy will lead to better understanding of the predictive role of various molecular and immune biomarkers and ultimately shine the horizon for this patient population. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

The advent of next generation sequencing has vastly improved the resolution of mutation detection, thereby both increasing the resolution of the analysis of cancer tissues and shining light on the existence of somatic driver mutations in normal tissues, even in the absence of cancer. Studies have described somatic driver mutations in normal skin, blood, peritoneal washings, and esophageal epithelium. Such findings prompt speculation on whether such mutations exist in other tissues, such as the eutopic endometrium in particular, due to the highly regenerative nature of the endometrium and the recent observation of recurrent somatic driver mutations in deep infiltrating and iatrogenic endometriosis (tissues believed to be derived from the eutopic endometrium) by our group and others. In the current study we investigated the presence of somatic driver mutations in histologically normal endometrium from women lacking evidence of gynecologic malignancy or endometrial hyperplasia. Twenty-five women who underwent hysterectomies and 85 women who underwent endometrial biopsies were included in this study. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were analyzed by means of targeted sequencing followed by orthogonal validation with droplet digital PCR. PTEN and ARID1A immunohistochemistry (IHC) was also performed as surrogates for inactivating mutations in the respective genes. Overall, we observed somatic driver-like events in over 50% of normal endometrial samples analyzed, including hotspot mutations in KRAS, PIK3CA, and FGFR2 as well as PTEN-loss by IHC. Analysis of anterior and posterior samplings collected from women who underwent hysterectomies was consistent with the presence of somatic driver mutations within clonal pockets spread throughout the uterus. The prevalence of such oncogenic mutations also increased with age (OR: 1.05 [95% CI: 1.00-1.10], p = 0.035). These findings have implications on our understanding of aging and so-called 'normal tissues', thereby necessitating caution in the utilization of mutation-based early detection tools for endometrial or other cancers. (c) 2019 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.