Economic burden in patients with ALK plus non-small cell lung cancer, with or without brain metastases, receiving second-line anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS
Authors: Lin, Huamao M.; Pan, Xiaoyun; Hou, Peijie; Huang, Hui; Wu, Yanyu; Ren, Kaili; Jahanzeb, Mohammad
Abstract
Aims: To describe the real-world economic burden of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with post-crizotinib, second-line ALK inhibitor therapy. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis using data from US Optum: Clinformatics Data Mart administrative claims database. Adult patients with ALK + NSCLC treated with ceritinib or alectinib as second-line ALK inhibitors between 1 January 2011 and 30 September 2017 were included. Healthcare costs and resource utilization for up to 1 year of therapy were calculated on a per-patient-per-month (PPPM) basis and stratified by presence or absence of brain metastases (BM). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with costs. Top ten cost drivers of non-inpatient procedure costs were recorded. Results: One hundred and twelve patients received second-line ALK inhibitors. Total mean PPPM healthcare costs were $23,984 for all patients receiving up to 1 year of post-crizotinib, second-line ALK inhibitor therapy. Total mean PPPM costs for patients with BM on or prior to post-crizotinib, second-line ALK inhibitor therapy were 1.37-times as high as those for patients without BM (p = 0.0406). Mean PPPM outpatient visits and inpatient hospitalization stays were higher for patients with BM versus no BM. The main cost drivers for non-inpatient procedures were radiation therapy, medications, and diagnostic radiology. Limitations: Analyses did not include newer ALK-directed therapies. BM development after the index date (defined as the date of the first claim for a second-line ALK inhibitor) may have been misclassified as non-BM. Findings may not be generalizable to patients with no health insurance coverage. Conclusions: Treatment of patients with ALK + NSCLC with ceritinib or alectinib as post-crizotinib, second-line ALK inhibitor therapy represents a high economic burden. Healthcare costs and resource utilization were significantly higher for patients with ALK + NSCLC with BM versus no BM.
PLEKHM2-ALK: A novel fusion in small-cell lung cancer and durable response to ALK inhibitors
LUNG CANCER
Authors: Li, Tao; Zhang, Fan; Wu, Zhaozhen; Cui, Longgang; Zhao, Xiaochen; Wang, Jinliang; Hu, Yi
Abstract
Objectives: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement identifies a subgroup of patients who are sensitive to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). ALK fusion is extremely rare in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). To the best of our knowledge, only two cases of SCLC harboring ALK fusion mutation has been reported previously, both of whom carrying EML4-ALK fusion. There are no standard treatment options for SCLC patients with ALK fusion mutations. Herein, we described a rare case of ALK-rearranged SCLC responding to ALK inhibitors. Materials and methods: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed on the biopsied tumor tissue. Results: NGS detected a novel pleckstrin homology and RUN domain containing M2 (PLEKHM2)-ALK fusion, while the IHC analysis revealed an ALK-positive tumor. For extensive SCLC patients, median OS was about 8-13 months. The patient in this case had durable clinical benefit upon the treatment with ALK inhibitors, achieving an overall survival (OS) of more than 27 months. Conclusion: This case provides a meaningful reference for the treatment of SCLC patients with ALK fusion mutations. This case also provides valuable information on the response to ALK inhibitors of patients with PLEKHM2-ALK fusion and better understanding of ALK-TKI applications in the future. NGS may be used as a routine test to explore more treatment opportunities for tumor SCLC patients.