Liver cancer: WISP3 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression by negative regulation of beta-catenin/TCF/LEF signalling
CELL PROLIFERATION
Authors: Gao, Hong; Yin, Fen-Fen; Guan, Dong-Xian; Feng, Yu-Xiong; Zheng, Qian-Wen; Wang, Xiang; Zhu, Min; Zhang, Xue-Li; Cheng, Shu-Qun; Chen, Tian-Wei; Jiang, Hao; Zhang, Er-Bin; Wang, Jing-Jing; Ni, Qian-Zhi; Yuan, Yan-Mei; Zhang, Feng-Kun; Ma, Ning; Cao, Hui-Jun; Wang, Yi-Kang; Li, Jing-Jing; Xie, Dong
Abstract
Objectives Wnt1-inducible signalling pathway protein 3 (WISP3/CCN6) belongs to the CCN (CYR61/CTGF/NOV) family of proteins, dysregulation of this family contributed to the tumorigenicity of various tumours. In this study, we need to explore its role in hepatocellular carcinoma that remains largely elusive. Materials and Methods The expression of WISP3/CCN6 was analysed by qRT-PCR and Western blotting. Effects of WISP3 on proliferation and metastasis of HCC cells were examined, respectively, by MTT assay and Boyden Chamber. Roles of WISP3 on HCC tumour growth and metastatic ability in vivo were detected in nude mice. Related mechanism study was confirmed by immunofluorescence and Western blotting. Results The expression of WISP3 was significantly downregulated in HCC clinical samples and cell lines, and reversely correlated with the tumour size. Forced expression of WISP3 in HCC cells significantly suppressed cell growth and migration in vitro as well as tumour growth and metastatic seeding in vivo. In contrast, downregulation of WISP3 accelerated cell proliferation and migration, and promoted in vivo metastasis. Further study revealed that WISP3 inhibited the translocation of beta-catenin to the nucleus by activating glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3 beta). Moreover, constitutively active beta-catenin blocked the suppressive effects of WISP3 on HCC. Conclusions Our study showed that WISP3 suppressed the progression of HCC by negative regulation of beta-catenin/TCF/LEF signalling, providing WISP3 as a potential therapeutic candidate for HCC.
Identification of cell-of-origin breast tumor subtypes in inflammatory breast cancer by gene expression profiling
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Authors: Van Laere, SJ; Van den Eynden, GG; Van der Auwera, I; Vandenberghe, M; van Dam, P; Van Marck, EA; van Golen, KL; Vermeulen, PB; Dirix, LY
Abstract
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive form of locally advanced breast cancer with high metastatic potential. Most patients have lymph node involvement at the time of diagnosis and 1/3 of the patients have distant metastases. In a previous study, we demonstrated that IBC is a distinct form of breast cancer in comparison with non-IBC. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of the different molecular subtypes in our data set of 16 IBC and 18 non-IBC specimen. Therefore, we selected an 'intrinsic gene set' of 144 genes, present on our cDNA chips and common to the Cyintrinsic gene set' described by Sorlie et al. [PNAS, 2003]. This set of genes was tested for performance in the Norway/Stanford data set by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Expression centroids were then calculated for the core members of each of the five subclasses in the Norway/Stanford data set and used to classify our own specimens by calculating Spearman correlations between each sample and each centroid. We identified the same cell-of-origin subtypes in IBC as those already described in non-IBC. The classification was in good agreement with immunohistochemical data for estrogen receptor protein expression and cytokeratin 5/6 protein expression. Confirmation was done by an alternative unsupervised hierarchical clustering method. The robustness of this classification was assessed by an unsupervised hierarchical clustering with an alternative gene set of 141 genes related to the cell-of-origin subtypes, selected using a discriminating score and iterative random permutation testing. The contribution of the different cell-of-origin subtypes to the IBC phenotype was investigated by principal component analysis. Generally, the combined ErbB2-overexpressing and basal-like cluster was more expressed in IBC compared to non-IBC, whereas the combined luminal A, luminal B and normal-like cluster was more pronounced in non-IBC compared to IBC. The presence of the same molecular cell-of-origin subtypes in IBC as in non-IBC does not exclude the specific molecular nature of IBC, since gene lists that characterize IBC and non-IBC are entirely different from gene lists that define the different cell-of-origin subtypes, as evidenced by principal component analysis.