Differential expression of Tbx4 and Tbx5 in Zebrafish fin buds
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
Authors: Tamura, K; Yonei-Tamura, S; Belmonte, KCI
Abstract
In here we report the identification of two new members of the T-box gene family, Zf-tbx5 and zf-tbx4, from the Zebrafish, Danio rerio. The amino acid sequences within the T-box domain share high homology with the mouse, chick, and newt orthologs. Whole mount in situ hybridization revealed specific expression of these genes in the eye and Fin buds. zf-tbx5 expression is restricted to the pectoral Fin bud, whilst zf-tbx4 transcripts are confined in the pelvic Fin bud. These results reveal the conserved expression pattern of Tbx5 and Tbx4 during appendage development in all animal species studied to date. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Differential DNA binding and transcription modulation by three T-box proteins, T, TBX1 and TBX2
GENE
Authors: Sinha, S; Abraham, S; Gronostajski, RM; Campbell, CE
Abstract
T-box genes encode a family of phylogenetically conserved DNA-binding proteins that regulate gene expression during embryogenesis. While the developmental importance of many T-box genes has been well documented, little is known about how family members differ in their DNA binding properties and ability to modulate transcription. Here we show that although TBX1, TBX2 and the Xenopus T protein (Xbra) share only 50-60% identity within their DNA-binding domains they can bind the same DNA sequence in vitro. However, the proteins differ in three important respects. While TBX1 protein binds a palindromic T oligonucleotide as a dimer, as had been previously reported for Xbra, TBX2 appears to bind the same DNA sequence as a monomer. Also, T protein/DNA complexes are stabilized in vitro by the addition of specific antibodies, whereas TBX2/DNA complexes are not stabilized by antibodies. Most importantly, TBX2 represses while Xbra activates transcription of the same chimeric reporter plasmid. TBX1, although capable of binding to the chimeric promoter, has no effect on transcription. Thus, while the DNA binding domains of T-box proteins share substantial homology, these proteins differ in both their DNA binding and transcriptional modulation properties. These results suggest that the various T-box proteins, while highly conserved, likely use different mechanisms to modulate transcription and may have different targets in vivo. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.