Metabolic markers for differentiation between renal allograft rejection and immunosuppressant toxicity in rat urine
METABOLOMICS
Authors: Schoening, Wenzel; Schmitz, Volker; Klawitter, Jelena; Christians, Uwe; Klawitter, Jost
Abstract
Introduction Although current immunosuppressive protocols have dramatically improved 1-year survival of kidney transplants, there has been less progress in terms of long-term graft survival over the last two decades. The key to avoiding late graft loss is early diagnosis and differentiation between anti-allograft immune processes and immunosuppressant toxicity (IS-Tox). Modern bioanalytical technologies have opened new opportunities for the development of sensitive and specific diagnostic tools. There is an immediate need for biomarkers that are able to differentiate between renal allograft rejection and immunosuppressant toxicity. Objective To test our hypothesis that changes of metabolite patterns in urine have the potential to serve as a non-invasive combinatorial biomarker that can differentiate between allograft immune reactions and IS-Tox. Methods We used H-1-NMR spectroscopy and Luminex multiplexing for metabolic profiling of rat urine and the analysis of protein biomarkers in urine and plasma, respectively, to compare the effects of chronic allograft rejection in a Fisher-to-Lewis rat transplant model with IS-Tox induced by cyclosporine, tacrolimus and/or sirolimus in Lewis rats. Results Our results showed that, while IS-Tox caused changes in metabolite patterns that are typically associated with proximal tubule damage, rejection caused more profuse changes not specifically focused on a particular kidney region. Moreover, metabolite pattern changes were more sensitive than changes in protein markers that were evident only during the later stages of rejection. Conclusion The present study provides first proof-of-concept that longitudinal monitoring of urine metabolite markers has the potential to differentiate between early renal allograft rejection and immunosuppressant nephrotoxicity.
The preclinical candidate indole-2-carboxamide improves immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in healthy subjects and individuals with type 2 diabetes
INTERNATIONAL MICROBIOLOGY
Authors: Cao, Ruoqiong; Islamoglu, Hicret; Teskey, Garrett; Gyurjian, Karo; Abrahem, Rachel; Onajole, Oluseye K.; Lun, Shichun; Bishai, William; Kozikowski, Alan; Fraix, Marcel P.; Sathananthan, Airani; Zhong, Li; Stec, Jozef; Venketaraman, Vishwanath
Abstract
A novel group of agents known as the indole-2-carboxamides (often referred to as indoleamides) have been shown to demonstrate high antimycobacterial activity. Studies have demonstrated that the best indoleamides possess desirable ADME/Tox properties, with less adverse effects and increased efficacy against both MDR-TB (multi-drug resistant TB) and XDR-TB (extensively drug-resistant TB). The primary mechanism of killing Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) by indoleamides is by disrupting the function of the essential mycolic acid transporter MmpL3 protein (Mycobacterial membrane protein Large 3). Therefore, targeting this essential mycobacterial transporter by small molecules opens new possibility for the development of novel and effective anti-TB agents. In the present study, we characterized the effects of indoleamides in altering the viability of Mtb in an in vitro granuloma model using immune cells derived from healthy subjects and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Our results indicate that treatment with the best indoleamide 3 resulted in a significant reduction in the viability of Mtb in both THP-1 macrophages as well as in granulomas derived from healthy individuals and subjects with T2DM. Graphical