SARM1 acts downstream of neuroinflammatory and necroptotic signaling to induce axon degeneration
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Authors: Ko, Kwang Woo; Milbrandt, Jeffrey; DiAntonio, Aaron
Abstract
Neuroinflammation and necroptosis are major contributors to neurodegenerative disease, and axon dysfunction and degeneration is often an initiating event. SARM1 is the central executioner of pathological axon degeneration. Here, we demonstrate functional and mechanistic links among these three pro-degenerative processes. In a neuroinflammatory model of glaucoma, TNF-alpha induces SARM1-dependent axon degeneration, oligodendrocyte loss, and subsequent retinal ganglion cell death. TNF-alpha also triggers SARM1-dependent axon degeneration in sensory neurons via a noncanonical necroptotic signaling mechanism. MLKL is the final executioner of canonical necroptosis; however, in axonal necroptosis, MLKL does not directly trigger degeneration. Instead, MLKL induces loss of the axon survival factors NMNAT2 and STMN2 to activate SARM1 NADase activity, which leads to calcium influx and axon degeneration. Hence, these findings define a specialized form of axonal necroptosis. The demonstration that neuroinflammatory signals and necroptosis can act locally in the axon to stimulate SARM1-dependent axon degeneration identifies a therapeutically targetable mechanism by which neuroinflammation can stimulate axon loss in neurodegenerative disease.
Immunohistochemical validation study of 15-gene biomarker panel predictive of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of JBR.10
ESMO OPEN
Authors: Grieve, Stacy; Ding, Keyue; Moore, Jonathan; Finniss, Mathew; Ray, Ayush; Lees, Miranda; Hossain, Faisal; Murugesan, Alli; Agar, Jane; Acar, Cenk; Taylor, James; Shepherd, Frances A.; Reiman, Tony
Abstract
Objective There are no validated approaches to predict benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for resected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to translate a 15-gene mRNA expression profile published by Zhu et al, shown to be prognostic and predictive of benefit, into a readily applicable immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel. Methods For seven of the genes in the gene expression profile (GEP) for which suitable commercial antibodies were available, we semiquantitatively assessed the IHC expression and prognostic significance for 173 patients treated at the Saint John Regional Hospital (SJRH). Cut-offs for high and low expression were defined for each marker and applied to IHC scores from 291 of the 482 patients in JBR.10, including patients on both the adjuvant chemotherapy and observation arms. The prognostic and predictive value of these markers on overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed by Cox regression models. Results In the SJRH cohort, in 62 patients with resected stage II-III NSCLC, the prognostic significance of IHC assays for four proteins were concordant with Zhu's GEP results. Low FOSL2 (OS, HR=0.15; p=0.0001; RFS, HR=0.14; p<0.0001) and high STMN2 (RFS, HR=2.501; p=0.0197) were adverse prognostic factors. Low ATP1B1 and low TRIM14 expression trended toward worse OS and RFS. Validation of these markers with JBR.10 patients failed to show prognostic significance either individually or in combined risk classifications. Additionally, the interaction between these markers and chemotherapy treatment in predicting OS (FOSL2, p=0.52; STMN2 p=0.14; ATP1B1, p=0.33; TRIM14, p=0.81) or RFS (FOSL2, p=0.63; STMN2, p=0.12; ATP1B1, p=0.66; TRIM14, p=0.57) did not reach significance, individually or in combination panels. Conclusions Zhu's GEP could not be translated into an IHC panel predictive of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Future predictive biomarker analysis in the adjuvant NSCLC setting may need to focus on novel therapies.