Anti-RAD51D polyclonal antibody

Simple Summary Germline and somatic variant testing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are important to predict treatment response to PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer patients. However, germline variants in other genes besides BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with ovarian cancer predisposition, which would be missed by a genetic testing aimed only at treatment decision. We aimed to evaluate the yield of clinically actionable germline variants using next-generation sequencing of a customized panel of 10 genes for the analysis of pathology samples of ovarian carcinomas. We identified clinically actionable germline variants in a significantly higher proportion of ovarian cancer patients when compared with genetic testing focused only on BRCA1 and BRCA2. This strategy increases the chance to make available genetic counseling, presymptomatic genetic testing, and gynecological cancer prophylaxis to female relatives who turn out to be healthy carriers of deleterious germline variants. Since the approval of PARP inhibitors for the treatment of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, in addition to cancer risk assessment, BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing also has therapeutic implications (germline and somatic variants) and should be offered to these patients at diagnosis, irrespective of family history. However, variants in other genes besides BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with ovarian cancer predisposition, which would be missed by a genetic testing aimed only at indication for PARP inhibitor treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the yield of clinically actionable germline variants using next-generation sequencing of a customized panel of 10 genes for the analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples from 96 ovarian carcinomas, a strategy that allows the detection of both somatic and germline variants in a single test. In addition to 13.7% of deleterious germline BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers, we identified 7.4% additional patients with pathogenic germline variants in other genes predisposing for ovarian cancer, namely RAD51C, RAD51D, and MSH6, representing 35% of all pathogenic germline variants. We conclude that the strategy of reflex gene-panel tumor testing enables the identification of clinically actionable germline variants in a significantly higher proportion of ovarian cancer patients, which may be valuable information in patients with advanced disease that have run out of approved therapeutic options. Furthermore, this approach increases the chance to make available genetic counseling, presymptomatic genetic testing, and gynecological cancer prophylaxis to female relatives who turn out to be healthy carriers of deleterious germline variants.

Objective: To reveal the distribution signature of cancer susceptibility genes in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, offering a diagnostic and prognostic surrogate for disease risk management and therapeutic decisions. Methods: A total of 282 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (182 males and 100 females) were enrolled in this study, with peripheral blood genomic DNA extracted. Mutations of 69 canonical cancer susceptibility genes or presumably tumor-related genes were analyzed by targeted capture-based high-throughput sequencing. Candidate mutations were particularly selected for discussion on tumor pathogenesis according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Results: In this study, 7.1% (20/282) of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were found to harbor mutations of canonical or presumable cancer susceptibility genes. The detection rate in male patients (3.8%, 7/182) was significantly lower than that in female patients (13%, 13/100) (P=0.004). The most recurrent mutations were in AT mutated (ATM) (1.1%, 3/282), followed by BRCAJ, BRIPI and RAD51D, all showed a detection rate of 0.7% (2/282). Mutations in three genes associated with hereditary gastric cancer syndromes were detected, namely, PMS2 and EPCAM associated with Lynch syndrome and CDHI associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. The detection frequencies were all 0.4% (1/282). Notwithstanding no significant difference observed, the age of patients with pathogenic mutations or likely pathogenic mutations is slightly younger than that of non-carriers (median age: 58.5 vs. 60.5 years old), while the age of patients with ATM mutations was the youngest overall (median age: 49.3 years old). Conclusions: Our study shed more light on the distribution signature and pathogenesis of mutations in gastric cancer susceptibility genes, and found the detection rate of pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations in male patients was significantly lower than that in female patients. Some known and unidentified mutations were found in gastric cancer, which allowed us to gain more insight into the hereditary gastric cancer syndromes from the molecular perspective.