Anti-PJA2 (aa 302-400) polyclonal antibody

The connection between circular RNAs (circRNAs) and gastric cancer has been reported widely in recent years. However, previous studies have focused mainly on circRNAs from gastric cancer tissue. The objectives of the present study were to detect dysregulated circRNAs from both tissue and plasma of patients with gastric cancer and to explore their potential roles in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. Expression profiles of circRNAs were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and analyzed using the GEO2R tool to identify differential expressed circRNAs. The significance threshold was set as |log2 (fold change)| > 2 and adjusted P < .05. The microRNA (miRNA) binding sites of the differentially expressed circRNAs were predicted using the Circular RNA Interactome web tool. TargetScan and the miRNet database were used to predict the miRNA target genes. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses were performed using Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery. Hub genes were identified and a network was constructed with Cytoscape. The overall survival rates for the selected miRNAs and messenger RNAs were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier Plotter. A total of three downregulated circRNAs (hsa_circ_0001190, hsa_circ_0036287, and hsa_circ_0048607) were identified in this study. Six miRNAs and eight hub genes met the significance criteria and were selected for further analysis. A circRNA-miRNA-hub gene network was constructed based on three circRNAs, six miRNAs, and eight hub genes. Evaluation of overall survival rates for the hub genes showed that low expression levels of GADD45A, PPP1CB, PJA2, and KLF2 were associated with poor overall survival. This study identified potential novel plasma circRNA biomarkers and provides insights into the underlying mechanisms of gastric cancer pathogenesis.

BackgroundInvasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast is characterized by its unique morphology and frequent nodal metastasis. However, the mechanism for development of this unique subtype has not been clearly elucidated. The aim of this study was to obtain a better understanding of IMPC.MethodsUsing representative cases of mixed IMPC, mRNA expression in the micropapillary area and usual invasive area was compared. Then, immunohistochemical analyses for 294 cases (76 invasive carcinomas with a micropapillary feature [ICMF] and 218 invasive carcinomas without a micropapillary feature [ICNMF]) were conducted. Clinicopathological analyses were also studied.ResultsDNA microarray analyses for mixed IMPC showed that BC-1514 (C21orf118) was commonly upregulated in the micropapillary area. CAMK2N1, CD1d, PJA2, RPL5, SAMD13, TCF4, and TXNIP were commonly downregulated in the micropapillary area. Immunohistochemically, we confirmed that BC-1514 was more upregulated in ICMF than in ICNMF. CD1d and PJA2 were more downregulated in ICMF than ICNMF. All patients with cases of PJA2 overexpression survived without cancer recurrence during the follow-up period, although the differences for disease-free (p=0.153) or overall survival (p=0.272) were not significant.ConclusionsThe CD1d- and PJA2-related tumour microenvironment might be crucial for IMPC. Further study of the immune microenvironment and micropapillary features is warranted.