Therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeting of neuronal pentraxin receptor to control metastasis in gastric cancer
MOLECULAR CANCER
Authors: Kanda, Mitsuro; Shimizu, Dai; Sawaki, Koichi; Nakamura, Shunsuke; Umeda, Shinichi; Miwa, Takashi; Tanaka, Haruyoshi; Tanaka, Chie; Hayashi, Masamichi; Iguchi, Yohei; Yamada, Suguru; Katsuno, Masahisa; Kodera, Yasuhiro
Abstract
Background Controlling metastasis is essential for improving the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC). Here, we aimed to identify a molecule required for GC metastasis and to investigate its potential utility as a target for the development of therapeutic antibodies (Abs). Methods Transcriptome and bioinformatics analyses of human GC cell lines identified the neuronal pentraxin receptor (NPTXR) as a candidate molecule.NPTXRfunction was probed by modulating its expression in GC cells and assessing the effects on intracellular signaling and malignant behaviors in vitro and in mouse xenograft models. We also generated anti-NPTXR Abs andNptxr(-/-)mice, and assessed the clinical significance ofNPTXRexpression in GC specimens. Results NPTXRmRNA expression in clinical specimens was associated with disease progression and was significantly higher in tissues from GC patients with distant metastasis compared with those without.NPTXRregulated expression of genes involved in metastatic behaviors as well as activation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR, FAK-JNK, and YAP signaling pathways.NPTXRsilencing promoted caspase-mediated apoptosis and attenuated GC cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, migration, invasion, adhesion, stem cell-like properties, and resistance to 5-fluorouracil in vitro, and also inhibited the tumorigenicity of GC cells in vivo. Anti-NPTXRAbs inhibited GC peritoneal metastasis in mice.Nptxr(-/-)mice showed no abnormalities in reproduction, development, metabolism, or motor function. Conclusions NPTXRplays an essential role in controlling the malignant behavior of GC cells in vitro and in vivo.NPTXR-targeting Abs may thus have utility as novel diagnostic tools and/or treatment modalities for GC.
Identification of novel cerebrospinal fluid biomarker candidates for dementia with Lewy bodies: a proteomic approach
MOLECULAR NEURODEGENERATION
Authors: van Steenoven, Inger; Koel-Simmelink, Marleen J. A.; Vergouw, Leonie J. M.; Tijms, Betty M.; Piersma, Sander R.; Pham, Thang V.; Bridel, Claire; Ferri, Gian-Luca; Cocco, Cristina; Noli, Barbara; Worley, Paul F.; Xiao, Mei-Fang; Xu, Desheng; Oeckl, Patrick; Otto, Markus; van der Flier, Wiesje M.; de Jong, Frank Jan; Jimenez, Connie R.; Lemstra, Afina W.; Teunissen, Charlotte E.
Abstract
Background Diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is challenging, largely due to a lack of diagnostic tools. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have been proven useful in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. Here, we aimed to identify novel CSF biomarkers for DLB using a high-throughput proteomic approach. Methods We applied liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry with label-free quantification to identify biomarker candidates to individual CSF samples from a well-characterized cohort comprising patients with DLB (n = 20) and controls (n = 20). Validation was performed using (1) the identical proteomic workflow in an independent cohort (n = 30), (2) proteomic data from patients with related neurodegenerative diseases (n = 149) and (3) orthogonal techniques in an extended cohort consisting of DLB patients and controls (n = 76). Additionally, we utilized random forest analysis to identify the subset of candidate markers that best distinguished DLB from all other groups. Results In total, we identified 1995 proteins. In the discovery cohort, 69 proteins were differentially expressed in DLB compared to controls (p < 0.05). Independent cohort replication confirmed VGF, SCG2, NPTX2, NPTXR, PDYN and PCSK1N as candidate biomarkers for DLB. The downregulation of the candidate biomarkers was somewhat more pronounced in DLB in comparison with related neurodegenerative diseases. Using random forest analysis, we identified a panel of VGF, SCG2 and PDYN to best differentiate between DLB and other clinical groups (accuracy: 0.82 (95%CI: 0.75-0.89)). Moreover, we confirmed the decrease of VGF and NPTX2 in DLB by ELISA and SRM methods. Low CSF levels of all biomarker candidates, except PCSK1N, were associated with more pronounced cognitive decline (0.37 < r < 0.56, allp < 0.01). Conclusion We identified and validated six novel CSF biomarkers for DLB. These biomarkers, particularly when used as a panel, show promise to improve diagnostic accuracy and strengthen the importance of synaptic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of DLB.