Expanded Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients to Assess Biomarker Status and Biology Over Time (CALGB 40502 and CALGB 40503, Alliance)
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Authors: Magbanua, Mark Jesus M.; Rugo, Hope S.; Wolf, Denise M.; Hauranieh, Louai; Roy, Ritu; Pendyala, Praveen; Sosa, Eduardo V.; Scott, Janet H.; Lee, Jin Sun; Pitcher, Brandelyn; Hyslop, Terry; Barry, William T.; Isakoff, Steven J.; Dickler, Maura; van't Veer, Laura; Park, John W.
Abstract
Purpose: We profiled circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to study the biology of blood-borne metastasis and to monitor biomarker status in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: CTCs were isolated from 105 patients with MBC using EPCAM-based immunomagnetic enrichment and fluorescence-activated cells sorting (IE/FACS), 28 of whom had serial CTC analysis (74 samples, 25 time points). CTCs were subjected to microfluidic-based multiplex QPCR array of 64 cancer-related genes (n = 151) and genome-wide copy-number analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH; n = 49). Results: Combined transcriptional and genomic profiling showed that CTCs were 26% ESR1(-)ERBB2(-), 48% ESR1(+)ERBB2(-), and 27% ERBB2(+). Serial testing showed that ERBB2 status was more stable over time compared with ESR1 and proliferation (MKI67) status. While cell-to-cell heterogeneity was observed at the single-cell level, with increasingly stable expression in larger pools, patient-specific CTC expression fingerprints were also observed. CTC copy-number profiles clustered into three groups based on the extent of genomic aberrations and the presence of large chromosomal imbalances. Comparative analysis showed discordance in ESR1/ER (27%) and ERBB2/HER2 (23%) status between CTCs and matched primary tumors. CTCs in 65% of the patients were considered to have low proliferation potential. Patients who harbored CTCs with high proliferation (MKI67) status had significantly reduced progression-free survival (P = 0.0011) and overall survival (P = 0.0095) compared with patients with low proliferative CTCs. Conclusions: We demonstrate an approach for complete isolation of EPCAM-positive CTCs and downstream comprehensive transcriptional/genomic characterization to examine the biology and assess breast cancer biomarkers in these cells over time. 2018 AACR.
Prognostic Significance of MTOR Pathway Component Expression in Neuroendocrine Tumors
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Authors: Qian, Zhi Rong; Ter-Minassian, Monica; Chan, Jennifer A.; Imamura, Yu; Hooshmand, Susanne M.; Kuchiba, Aya; Morikawa, Teppei; Brais, Lauren K.; Daskalova, Anastassia; Heafield, Rachel; Lin, Xihong; Christiani, David C.; Fuchs, Charles S.; Ogino, Shuji; Kulke, Matthew H.
Abstract
Purpose Clinical studies have implicated the mechanistic target of rapamycin (serine/threonine kinase; MTOR) pathway in the regulation of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) growth. We explored whether expression of MTOR pathway components has prognostic significance in NET patients. Patients and Methods We evaluated immunohistochemical expression of MTOR and phospho (p) -MTOR; its downstream targets RPS6KB1, RPS6, and EIF4EBP1; and its upstream regulators, in a cohort of 195 archival neuroendocrine tumors. We correlated expression levels with clinical outcomes, after adjusting for other prognostic variables. Results We observed anticipated correlations between expression of upstream components of the MTOR pathway and their downstream targets. Expression of PIK3CA, MTOR, or p-EIF4EBP1 was associated with high MKI67 (Ki-67) labeling index. We failed to identify clinical correlations associated with expression of the upstream regulators TSC1, TSC2, AKT, p-AKT, PDPK1, PTEN, PIK3R1, or PIK3CA. In contrast, high expression of MTOR or its activated downstream targets p-RPS6KB1, p-RPS6, or p-EIF4EBP1 was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Conclusion Our observations suggest that expression of MTOR or its downstream targets may be adverse prognostic factors in neuroendocrine tumors. (C) 2013 by American Society of Clinical Oncology